Notice of International Jurisdiction served 8th September 2014

NOTICE OF INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION

OVER
RANGIHOU LANDS,  RANGIHOU SACRED BURIAL SITE,
1A MORTON STREET, 2 MORTON STREET,
BALUDARRI WETLANDS

PARRAMATTA, GONDWANA LAND
(Parramatta  NSW Australia)

 

“Enough is Enough!”

RESPONDENTS: Parramatta City Council, Greg Dyer, Think Planners (Developer), M. Dibben (Developer), Department of Planning and Environment, its persons, officers, public servants, actors, contractors, staff

SENT TO: The Australian Federal Police, NSW Commissioner of Police, Attorney General, Prime Minister of Australia, Governor General, Premier of NSW, ICAC Commissioner, International Sheriff of Common Law Court of Justice Australia, Parramatta Sheriff, United Nations President and Kevin Arnett ITCCS

PROPONENTS: Assembled Owners ©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™

NOTICE

All respondents (corporate officers) be advised that this is a notice of INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION over Rangihou Lands, Rangihou Sacred Burial Site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, Parramatta Gondwana Land (New South Wales 2150 Australia), which will now be known Internationally as Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign State (Nation & Embassy).

The notice has been served pursuant to a direct violation against the assembled owners of ©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™ and sovereignheirs for:

  • Development Application DA/522/2014 Lot 8 DP 1097934 Council Depot 1A Morton Street Parramatta NSW 2150 dated 15 August 2014 for the Construction of a raised temporary exhibition home with 10 onsite parking spaces for 3 years. [Attachment 1]
  • Assessment Report DA/391/2012/A Lot 1 DP 817709 2 Morton Street Parramatta NSW 2150 dated 13 December 2012 for the Construction of a mixed use development containing approximately 770 apartments 440 Car Spaces. [Attachment 11]
  • Development of a raised bike park on Baludarri Wetlands – No Development Application cited.
  • Illegal occupation, buying and selling of lands Rangihou Lands, Rangihou Sacred Burial Site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, Parramatta Gondwana Land (New South Wales 2150 Australia) without a true bill of sale or lawful land management arrangement with Sovereign Darug Tribes of Gondwana Land.
  • The fact that Parramatta City Council is ILLEGAL-UNLAWFUL. Nothing more than a Body Corporate ABN 49907174773 pretending to be Government (Facts outlined in Notice).
  • Operating a slavery system, Treachery, Human rights crimes against humanity, economic deprivation, operating a slavery system, trespass, illegally and unlawfully seizing property, selling property, forcible possession, theft, debt bondage, blackmail, extortion, political persecution, interference of tribal sacred lands, unlawful rates and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under Gods Lore/Law, Common and International Law, Aboriginal, Originee and Maori (Kawa, Tikanga, Customary) Lore/Law, economic deprivation, as a culpable individual and as the responsible head officer of a criminal organisation, corporation known as the Parramatta City Council and/or conspiring with a criminal organisation.

The development applications and works are in direct violation of the Trespass Notice dated 17th December 2013 [Attachment 3], Commercial Lien Claim UCC1 – 2014-069-8362-5 and 2014-069-8361-8 dated 10th March 2014 over all lands that abut Rangihou and Final Notice to Remedy dated14th March 2014 which today, all stand unrebutted, accepted and honoured. [Attachment 4 & 5].

This notice is supported by Lee Nangala Lacey of the Aboriginal Embassy in Canberra, co-founder of the National Indigenous Human Rights Congress Australia 2002. Lee Nangala Lacey has been appointed to the Common Law Court of Justice Australia with International Jurisdiction and the International Court Seal.

This notice is supported by the Sovereign Queen of Gondwana Land ‘Jingki’and Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwana Land.

 

FACTS RELIED UPON IN NOTICES Unrebutted, Accepted, Honoured

This notice of International Jurisdiction is now served on all respondents pursuant to the facts established in Notices of Rebuttal, Letters, Certificates of Non-response, Affidavits, Default Notices, Courtesy Notices, Invoices and Commercial Lien Claim which are all public notices, which today stand unrebutted, accepted and honoured;

  1. Trespass Notice 16.2.12 UNREBUTTED
  2. Trespass Notice, Notice of Rebuttal dated 27.2.12 UNREBUTTED
  3. Letter regarding Referendum dated 14.3.13 UNREBUTTED
  4. Courtesy Notice from Alex Kain dated 20.3.13 UNREBUTTED
  5. Letter regarding Validity of Parramatta City Council dated 26.3.13 UNREBUTTED
  6. Letter regarding illegal selling of Rangihou and dumping of Asbestos dated 29.3.13 and Invoice $35,000,036,000*oz IGNORED
  7. Courtesy Notice dated 23.5.13 UNREBUTTED
  8. Affidavit Notice of Rebuttal dated 27.5.13 UNREBUTTED
  9. Notice of Rebuttal dated 31.5.13 and 1st Invoice DT835292 $431,038,500*oz UNREBUTTED
  10. Affidavit and Notice of Rebuttal dated 4.6.13 UNREBUTTED
  11. Courtesy Notice dated 4.6.13 UNREBUTTED
  12. Letter regarding Cultural Centre 24.6.13 IGNORED
  13. Letter regarding A Special Relationship dated 24.6.13 IGNORED
  14. Notice of Rebuttal dated 10.7.13 and 2nd Invoice DT835292 $431,038,500*oz UNREBUTTED
  15. UNREBUTTED
  16. Notice of Rebuttal dated 2.9.13 and 3rd Invoice DT835292 $431,278,500*oz UNREBUTTED
  17. Affidavit of Notice of Default. Total of Damages and Obligation $1,184,845,000,000 and Rangihou land and all that abuts Rangihou 8.10.13 UNREBUTTED
  18. Commercial Lien Claim including all lands that abut Rangihou 12.11.13 UNREBUTTED
  19. Certificate of Non-Response 9.12.13 UNREBUTTED
  20. Notice of Trespass and Intent to Occupy 17.12.13 UNREBUTTED
  21. Notice of Intent to Occupy 25.2.14 LETTER RECIEVED
  22. Final Notice to Remedy 14th March 2014 UNREBUTTED
  23. ICAC Press Release, Corruption Enquiry, ICAC states “No one in the executive arm of government … is above the reach of this commission,” Commissioner Latham said, 28.8.2014, The Daily Telegraph
  24. ICAC Press Release, Corruption Enquiry, ICAC exposes the NSW Legislature as the most corrupt parliament in Australian history 29.8.2014, The Daily Telegraph
  25. Public Notice of International Jurisdiction over Rangihou Lands, Rangihou Sacred Burial Site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, Parramatta Gondwana Land
  26. Public Notice of Eviction Order and Right to Entry Order [Attachment 12]
  27. International Citizen’s Arrest Warrant [Attachment 13]
  28. Common Law Peace Officers Authorization [Attachment 14]

All notices are of Public Record with the Parramatta City Council

 

LAND INTERESTS – RANGIHOU LANDS, RANGIHOU SACRED BURIAL SITE, 1A MORTON STREET, 2 MORTON STREET & BALUDARRI WETLANDS

The land that will now be placed under International Jurisdiction is as follows:

  • Rangihou Reserve, Rangihou Sacred Burial Site and Council Depot 1A Morton St, Historical Sites of State Significance (within the boundary of Parramatta River, Macarthur Street, Rangihou Crescent, Morton Street), as per the Land Map 1:1.
    1. Lot 22 DP 876418 – Title 22/876418
    2. Lot 21 DP 876418 – Title 21/876418
    3. Lot C DP 162815 – Title C/162815
    4. Lot 1 DP 120464 – Title 1/120464
    5. Lot 1 DP 120464 – Title 7652-218
    6. Lot 16 DP 1141023 – Title 16/1141023
    7. Lot 2 DP 1089537 – Title 2/1089537
    8. Lot 15 DP 1141023 – Title 15/1141023
    9. Lot 155 DP 128846 – Title 155/128846
    10. Lot 8 DP 1097934 – Title 8/1097934
    11. Lot 1 DP 587055 – Title 1/587055
    12. Lot X DP 164380 – Title X/164380

 

  • Original land gifting of Rangihou 112 Acres Historical Site of State Significance (within the boundary of Parramatta River, Morton Street, Victoria Road and Wilde Avenue) as per the Land Map 1:1.
  1. all land areas that abut Rangihou

 

  • 2 Morton St, adjourning land between Rangihou and Baludarri (within the boundary of Parramatta River, Morton Street, Broughton Street), as per the Land Map 1:1.
  1. Lot 1 DP 817709 
  2. Unnumb EASE 265969 

 

  • Baludarri Wetlands, Site of National Significance (within the boundary of Parramatta River, Pemberton Street, Thomas Street), as per the Land Map 1:1.
  1. Lot 5 DP 20765
  2. Lot 2 DP 566807
  3. Lot 1 DP 566807
  4. Lot 141 DP 537053

Map of Parramatta, Rangihou, Baludarri adjourned 2013

Land Map 1:1

 

 RANGIHOU HISTORICAL SITE OF STATE SIGNIFICANCE

In support of the claim of International Jurisdiction Parramatta City Council officially recognised and acknowledged Rangihou as an Historical Site of State Significance for Maori.

Public record: Archaeological Reports Rangihou Reserve and 1A Morton Street, from Godden Mackay Logan October 2012.

The statement of significance highlighted that Rangihou has strong historical association with the Maori community, particularly those affiliated with the Nga Puhi tribal line in both Australia and New Zealand. The site has significance for its connection to the high-born Maori Nga Puhi (sons of Maori Nga Puhi Chiefs) children that were sent to be educated by Marsden at the Rangihou Seminary. For the Maori community, the land that originally comprised of the Rangihou Seminary, which includes Rangihou Reserve and the 1A Morton Street Site, has strong historical associations with the children who were educated there (including many that died and are still buried at Rangihou).

The Maori community values the location of the Rangihou Seminary. The site has strong connections to Rangihoua in New Zealand, where Marsden delivered the first Anglican sermon in New Zealand.

The cultural and spiritual attachments to the site are demonstrated by the continual visitation by members of the Maori community who commemorate and perpetuate the memory of the ancestors that once lived at Rangihou, the Maori Chiefs Hongi Hika, Ruatara, Korokoro and the Maori children who were educated and buried at Rangihou. The historical associations and social significance of Rangihou Reserve, Rangihou Lands, Rangihou Sacred Burial Site and 1A Morton Street sites are RARE in NSW Australia.

Of particular importance is that Maori use these areas of land for community use;  Rangihou Reserve, Rangihou Lands, Rangihou Sacred Burial Site and 1A Morton Street sites in their ongoing cultural celebrations.

The intangible cultural heritage values associated with the site should be managed appropriately.  This shall include but is not limited to, implementation of interpretation measures within any future development of Rangihou Reserve, Rangihou Lands, Rangihou Sacred Burial Site and 1A Morton Street, developed in consultation with the Maori Community, which today has included one meeting only with Frazer Developments.  The publicly accessible areas of the study areas, such as the floodplain area, presents an opportunity to recognise and celebrate the historical significance of the site.

The site’s association with the Maori community has significance at a STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL.  Further research into the social values of the site, including consultation and its association with Maori people is likely to indicate that the site would meet the threshold for STATE SIGNIFICANCE. Further assessment of these values, including consultation, may reveal the intangible cultural heritage values to meet the threshold of STATE SIGNIFICANCE. Today, no council or developers have had further consultation with Maori to find out the truth, discuss or reveal the intangible cultural heritage values of Rangihou or Baludarri.

Let it be known that Christian 699/70NZ aka ©Turikatuku III Gumada™ was responsible for initiating and facilitating the Archaeological Assessment with Parramatta City Council.  ©Turikatuku III Gumada™  enlisted the assistance of Archaeological expert Peter Douglas (Archaeological and Heritage Management Solutions) and Albert Stafford (Project Management and feasibility study) from The Stafford Group.

 

BALUDARRI WETLANDS NATIONAL SITE OF SIGNIFICANCE

In support of the claim of International Jurisdiction Parramatta City Council officially recognised and acknowledged Baludarri a Site of National Significance for Aboriginal.

Public record: Baludarri Wetland, Wetland Plan of Management 2010 CMA Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority.

Baludarri Wetlands has the status of community land, which is land defined as land that should be kept for the use of the general community, and cannot be sold; nor can it be leased for more than 21 years [Page 10 of Wetlands Plan].

http://www.parracity.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/86409/BaludarriWetlandPOM.pdf

 

RANGIHOU & BALUDARRI WETLANDS

Rangihou and Baludarri Wetlands are both RARE HISTORICAL SITES OF STATE AND NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE yet council’s objectives and illegal actions do not support this.

Through approving the development applications for 770 apartments and 440 car spaces and the Construction of a raised temporary exhibition home with 10 onsite parking spaces for 3 years , in and around two RARE sites of Historical National and State Significance, Parramatta City Council are in direct violation for not:

  • Conserving the significance of heritage items, heritage sites, cultural significance, their settings, historic subdivisions, conservation areas and sacred burial ground.
  • Facilitating the preservation of these areas and sites and their presentation as an important cultural tourist attraction.
  • Protecting and promoting the natural assets of Rangihou and Baludarri Wetlands for recreation.

Through approving the development applications for 770 apartments and 440 car spaces and the Construction of a raised temporary exhibition home with 10 onsite parking spaces for 3 years, in and around two RARE sites of Historical National and State Significance, Parramatta City Council are in direct violation for:

  • Desecrating heritage items, heritage sites, cultural sites of significance, their settings, historic subdivisions, conservation areas and the sacred burial ground.
  • For building and over building a major development, in particular; size; height; overshadowing; pollution; air; disruption; and car parking on RARE Historical National and State site/s of significance without consultation, negotiation or remedy with the sovereign custodians of the said lands.

 

COMMERCIAL LIEN CLAIM

Parramatta City Council and respondents (not including, but not excluding Think Planners and M Dibben) have been served Commercial Lien Claim UCC1 – 2014-069-8362-5 and 2014-069-8361-8 and Default Notice dated 10th March 2014. All processes are those in which Constitutional and Commercial Rights of Commercial Lien Claim UCC1 – 2014-069-8362-5 and 2014-069-8361-8 total claim of obligation $1,184,945,000,000*oz (99.9% pure silver) are to date unrebutted and therefore accepted and honored.

  1. Nothing has been provided to Lien Claimant by any Public Council Official or Officer (Including Ministers), to demonstrate or prove that they are Commercially Bonded to operate any processes which rebuts, abridges or denies any Commercial provision of the alleged Australian Constitution.
  2. All Lien Debtors of Commercial Lien Claim UCC1 – 2014-069-8362-5 and 2014-069-8361-8 have waived the right to answer by acquiescence, tacit admission and failed to contest, reject your due process opportunity; and
  3. All Lien Debtors of Commercial Lien Claim UCC1 – 2014-069-8362-5 and 2014-069-8361-8 are now fully liable (unlimited) personally and company.

DAMAGES AND OBLIGATION: The cited Lien Debtors were liened for a minimum of $1,000,000*oz (One Million*oz)( of one troy ounce coins of 99.9% pure silver) each per day for operating or perpetuating any and all private money systems, issuing, collection, legal enforcement systems and any and all SLAVERY SYSTEMS of and against any and all ‘Originals’ and ‘Sovereigns’ of Gondwana Land since first declaration of facts on 27.2.12 (total 589 days);

  • Obligation Penalty Robert Lang $589,000,000*oz (Five Hundred and Eighty Nine Million*oz).
  • Obligation Penalty John Chedid $589,000,000*oz (Five Hundred and Eighty Nine Million *oz).
  • Obligation Penalty Debbie Killian $589,000,000*oz (Five Hundred and Eighty Nine Million *oz).
  • Obligation Penalty Neville Davis $589,000,000*oz (Five Hundred and Eighty Nine Million *oz). Obligation Penalty Parramatta City Council ABN 49907174773 $589,000,000*oz (Five Hundred and Eighty Nine Million *oz).
  • Obligation Penalty Sue Coleman severally and jointly responsible for the damages.
  • Obligation Penalty Sue Weatherley severally and jointly responsible for the damages.

DAMAGES AND OBLIGATION: The cited Lien Debtors were liened for a minimum of $1,000,000,000*oz (One Billion*oz)( of one troy ounce coins of 99.9% pure silver) each year for theft, illegal occupation and illegal possession of any and all said lands in the Parramatta Ward since 1762 (251 years);

  • Obligation Penalty Robert Lang $251,000,000,000*oz (Two Hundred and Fifty One Billion*oz).
  • Obligation Penalty Parramatta City Council ABN 49907174773 $251,000,000,000*oz (Two Hundred and Fifty One Billion*oz).
  • Obligation Penalty Sue Coleman severally and jointly responsible for the damages.
  • Obligation Penalty Sue Weatherley severally and jointly responsible for the damages.

DAMAGES AND OBLIGATION: The cited Lien Debtors were liened for a minimum of $1,000,000,000*oz (One Billion*oz)( of one troy ounce coins of 99.9% pure silver) each year for knowingly, willingly, and intentionally dumping asbestos on the land of Rangihou (60 years);

  • Obligation Penalty Robert Lang $60,000,000,000*oz (Sixty Billion*oz).
  • Obligation Penalty John Chedid $60,000,000,000*oz (Sixty Billion*oz).
  • Obligation Penalty Parramatta City Council ABN 49907174773 $60,000,000,000*oz (Sixty Billion*oz).
  • Obligation Penalty Sue Coleman severally and jointly responsible for the damages.
  • Obligation Penalty Sue Weatherley severally and jointly responsible for the damages.

DAMAGES AND OBLIGATION: The cited Lien Debtors were liened for a minimum of $100,000,000,000*oz (One Hundred Billion*oz)( of one troy ounce coins of 99.9% pure silver) for knowingly, willingly, and intentionally desecrating the sacred burial site and graves of Originees (Aboriginal) and high born sons of Maori Nga Puhi Chiefs, on any and all land areas of Rangihou and Baludarri;

  • Obligation Penalty Robert Lang $100,000,000,000*oz (One Hundred Billion*oz).
  • Obligation Penalty John Chedid $100,000,000,000*oz (One Hundred Billion*oz).
  • Obligation Penalty Debbie Killian $100,000,000,000*oz (One Hundred Billion*oz).
  • Obligation Penalty Neville Davis $100,000,000,000*oz (One Hundred Billion*oz).
  • Obligation Penalty Parramatta City Council ABN 49907174773 $100,000,000,000*oz (One Hundred Billion*oz).
  • Obligation Penalty Sue Coleman severally and jointly responsible for the damages.
  • Obligation Penalty Sue Weatherley severally and jointly responsible for the damages.

TOTAL CLAIM OF OBLIGATION: Grand Total of Damages and Obligation $1,184,945,000,000*oz (One Trillion, One Hundred and Eighty Four Billion, Nine Hundred and Forty Five Million)(of one troy ounce coins of 99.9% pure silver)  and Rangihou land and all that abuts Rangihou land in the boundary of any and all Parramatta’s Land Wards, including but not limited to; Arthur Phillip, Caroline, Chisholm, Elizabeth Macarthur, Lachlan Macquarie and Woodville.  All Lien Debtors are severally and jointly responsible for the damages and obligation stated herein.

Be advised that debt collectors will be employed to make claim on this debt bond (Commercial Lien Claim) against cited Lien Debtors, effective immediately.


SUPPORTERS OF THIS INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION

Notices submitted to the Parramatta City Council and its agents were supported by the following individuals/sovereigns from Aotearoa and Gondwana Land;

  1. Assembled owners ©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™
  2. Hoori Harihona, Sovereign Tribal Elder, Patu Koraha Tribal Nation and Te Whakaminenga o nga Hapu O Aotearoa
  3. Japanangka, Tribal Elder, Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwana Land
  4. Jingki Ngombal, Sovereign Queen, Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwana Land
  5. Nambrimbrii, Darug Senior Elder, Leader and Historian of Gondwana Land
  6. Rewi Haukore II, Tribal Elder, Tribal Sovereign Nations of the Earth
  7. King George Watene Tautari, Confederation of Chiefs of the United Tribes of Aotea
  8. Common Law Court of Justice Australia with International Jurisdiction and International Court Seal – Aboriginal Human Rights Commission, Aboriginal Embassy Canberra
  9. Tane Mahaki, Tribal Lore Principal Representative
  10. Catarina Sorensson, Common Law Notary Public

 

LAND GIFTING OF RANGIHOU TO MAORI

1778 – Parramatta was gifted to Sovereign King Patetonga Tautari for his Kauri trade with the Darugal Tribe. The New South Wales settler government issued a Crown Grant Title in his name, he transferred his share of land under the Public Works Act, whereby accounts were set up (which are held today in the Treasury bank) under the Consolidated Fund Act. The New South Wales Settler Government used the compounding interest from these accounts to develop the Parramatta lands, NSW etc. [Attachment 6 Email]

1811 – Rangihou was gifted to Maori Ngati Hine Chief Te Ruki Kawiti. Originee’s (Australian Aboriginals)of the time had their own form of real estate survey methods and at the offering of land by the Darug Clan through trade in the 1700’s to a Paramount Nga Puhi Chief they advised that when his people were ready to use the land they were to mark the boundary by cutting notches into the trees thereby alerting the Darug Clan to their presence.  At the time of a particular boundary marking in 1811 by the Nga Hine Chief Kawiti, the Reverend Samuel Marsden was a witness to this traditional form of land surveying to which he enquired as to “What they were doing”? Kawiti (Toweetee Teetooa) replied that they were marking out land for Kawiti to work when he returned. Once Marsden’s question was answered, the reality of the occasion set in and Rev Samuel Marsden replied with the statement that “he would give as much land as he liked and he might begin tomorrow”. As far as Kawiti was concerned the land was already his through the original offering by the Darug Clan, but Marsden’s words in truth is the mother of justice, for as representative voice for God it reinforced Kawiti’s ownership, as per this journal extract;

This morning I took them in my Chaise to see Duaterra’s Farm,  when they beheld his wheat just ripe, his peas, beans etc. they were highly gratified and in a few minutes I observed them marking a Line across my Farm and cutting notches with a Knife in the Stumps of the trees – I inquired what they were doing – They told me they were marking out a Farm for Toweetee Teetooa, that he would return to New Zealand the first opportunity and bring one hundred men to work upon the Farm. I told him I would give him as much Land as he liked, and he might begin tomorrow. [Attachment 7]

At this time, 1811 the settlers means of survey was ‘the length of chain’. The originees (Aboriginal) means of survey was and is ‘the cutting of notches in trees’. This is again confirmation of the land gifting to Maori. Samuel Marsden did try to make claim to this land gifting but the fact remains, the land wasn’t his to give in the first place. Only the Darug Clan could gift the land, not the settlers of the time.

1830 – Rangihou was gifted to Maori Nga Puhi Chief Eruera Maihi Patuone for the confiscation of his cargo and ship Sir George Murray in Sydney.

2006 – Rangihou was again gifted to Maori from the Darug (Duhrug) and Eora People in a ceremony, Hands across the ocean http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10403608. It marks an important exchange between Aboriginal and Maori. Maori elders accepted the land gift from the Duhrug and Eora people in a ceremony and named the land Rangihou Reserve 30 Sept 2006.

Adrian Kururangi (Maori witness and previous employee in Parramatta City Council) confirmed the valid claim by saying “ The claim is valid, however the local aboriginal community waived this claim regarding the Rangihou Reserve in a ceremony that was acknowledge by the than mayor in 2006-2007. That gifted the land back to the Maori, I was a part of the process that witnessed this happening”. [Attachment 8]

2012 – Confirmation of land gifting to Maori by Nambrimbrii, Darug Elder, Tribal Leader and Historian 24th February 2012 is the signing of the maps and land areas of concern. [Attachment 9]

 

PREAMBLE

Please be advised that the true living Private Sovereign Assembled Owners by International Common Law Registration, being of age of majority, complete in our faculties and natural born Divine creations within our constitutional private survey boundaries of Parramatta within Gondwana Land, the proper jurisdiction of a Common Law thereto do solemnly make this reaffirmation of character pursuant to our absolute freedom of the mansions of the Creator and principal in good standing and behavior of  ©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™ as ordained and established with reservation of all Divinely created and inherent unalienable Rights.

We are “Original Tribal Women and Men” of “blood and heritage” of Aotearoa and Gondwana Land,  and  am recognized through the supreme gods. As Assembled Owners, we are standing in our truth, as with the natural and supernatural worlds, where creation began with ‘Te Kore’ (chaos, or the void), then ‘Te Pō’ (the night), and then ‘Te Ao Mārama’ (the world of light). In our Original Nationality, all living things are linked through genealogy. ‘Tāne’, the god of the forest, shaped the first woman, ‘Hineahuone’, from the soil and took her as his wife and thereafter family was created.

From our ancestors down, we do affirm that we are consciously aware, we are “Sovereign  Being” “Heir” “Successor”, living in a “Sovereign Estate” in the “Greater Universe Continuum”. We are integrally interlocked to the immutable laws of the “Natural Element” wherein my inalienable “Sovereignty” is constituted in interlocutory natural laws.

Therefore, as the “Original Tribal Women and Men” of “blood and heritage” of Aotearoa and Gondwana Land, please be advised that in the matter of Crown Protectorates and Common Law Doctrine: Magna Carta, Section 39; Halsbury’s Statutes 3rd edition, Volume 36 – Statutes, paragraph 559 page 337 paragraph 12, 12(1); Standing Orders; He Wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni 1835 [Declaration of Independence 1835]; Te Tiriti O Waitangi 1840 [Treaty of Waitangi 1840]; New Zealand Constitution Act (United Kingdom) 1846 section 10; 1846 Royal Charter and Instructions, chapter xiv; as a Sovereign on this land, we  would like to remind you that we are internationally protected, through the acknowledgement of his Majesty’s Royal Protection in perpetuity (Letters Patent) and by the ‘New Zealand United Tribes Flag 1835’ endorsed by King William IV gazetted in the NSW Gazette Notice 17th August 1835.

©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™ are an Independent Sovereign Nation State operating on sovereign land pursuant to our land right claim and self government notice, outlining this facts, sent to DBA Her Majesty the Queen as a public defender of the Faith, The Vatican, all Governor Generals of the Commonwealth of the World, Prime Minister of New Zealand, Prime Minister of Australia, Police Commissioners of Australia and New Zealand and the Royal Navy 9th September 2013 in accordance with International laws and He Wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni 1835 [Declaration of Independence 1835] as follows; The Australian and New Zealand Government and Corporations silence is a tacit consent to agree that Paremata O Baludarri Rangjhou Sovereign Nation (aka Te Kotahitanga Rangihou Marae Council) is an independent Sovereign Nation and Parliament. We formally adopted and declared our lawful standing pursuant to Notice of Rebuttal 2.9.13, Affidavit 8.10.13, Commercial Lien Claim 12.11.13, Certificate of Non-Response 9.12.13, Notice of Trespass and Intent to Occupy 17.12.13 & 25.2.14 and Final Notice to Remedy 14th March 2014 and commenced business on 9th September 2013.

It is at this time that under a ‘cloak of peace’, that we the Assembled Owners of Paremata of Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation;  Japanangka Tribal Leader and Lore Man, Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwana Land; Jingka Ngombal Tribal Leader and Lore Woman, Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwana Land; Rewi II Haukore Tribal Elder & Advisor, Tribal Sovereign Nations of the Earth; Hoori Harihona Paerata Sovereign Nga Puhi Tribal Elder & Advisor, He Whakaminenga o Nga Hapu Justice of the Peace; do stand in the same light as Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth II, guaranteed in perpetual harmony by King William IV and Maori Warrior Nga Puhi Chief Hongi Hika 1814.  Her Majesty’s representatives are inarguably bound by Oath to the Most High Source of Creation to honor, respect and defend the ‘New Zealand United Tribes Flag of 1835’ alongside all tribes and cultures in the Pacific Ocean (including Gondwana Land).

It is at this time that Paremata of Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation will assert full powers, sovereign rights, privileges conferred by the Treaty of Versailles 1919; the Covenant of the League of Nations; He Wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni [The Declaration of Independence 1835]; Te Tiriti O Waitangi 1840 [Treaty of Waitangi 1840]; and the Te Ture Whenua Maori Maori Land Act 1993 as far and in so far as is possible, in a manner that facilitates and promotes the retention, use, development and control of Rangihou Lands, Rangihou sacred burial site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands Parramatta as Taonga Tuku Iho by Original Sovereign beneficial owners, executors, administrators, heirs and successors.

It is at this time that we renounce and reclare void, ab initio, any and all attempts De Facto Renegade Corporate by means of fictions or otherwise of any changes in my lawful status. This includes all Corporate; Statutory; Military; Maritime; Admiralty; Fictitious Democracy; UNITED KINGDOM et al. Such corporations fraudulent and non-existent in the Law include but are not limited to the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA or GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA.

It is at this time that we announce and declare that the Assembled Owners of  Paremata of Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation are the RIGHTFUL HEREDITARY BEARERS, GUARDIANS AND PROTECTORS OF THIS LAND namely Rangihou Lands, Rangihou sacred burial sites, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands; BEARER, GUARDIAN AND PROTECTOR BY CONQUEST, under the ‘law of war’, by which as Sovereign with the integrity of the de jure, Lawful, Heir in Lore, Law, by birthright and in abeyance, she is rightfully able to seize and occupy the said lands mentioned above.

 

NOTICE OF CLAIM OF RIGHT TO INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION

Respondents and the Parramatta City Council;

  1. Be advised that Australia became a belligerent Independent Sovereign Nation State on the 28th of June 1919 when the then Prime Minister of Australia (William Hughes) signed the Treaty of Versailles.  This FACT was FURTHER evidenced in October 1919, when this fact was recorded in the Hansard of the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.  This FACT was FURTHER ratified on the 10th of January 1920 when Mr. Hughes and the Australian Deputy Prime Minister (Sir Joseph Cook) signed the League of Nations Covenant, making the Commonwealth of Australia a foundation Member.  This FACT was FURTHER ratified in June 1945, when Australia became a foundation member of the United Nations by signing the United Nations Charter.
  2. Take note that due to the significant International disputation over the legality of the use of the Act (63 & 64 VICTORIA, CHAPTER 12) An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia.(9th July 1900)UK (Long Title) within Australia in respect of and against the freedoms and rights and privileges of tribal and sovereign members and beneficiaries of Gondwanna Land (aka Australia); places no faith in the integrity of, and refuses to recognise the legality of the purported governments, councils and its agencies of Australia, including the Parramatta City Council, nor the “Judicial” system until they can provide the evidence sought by  ©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™ and Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwanna Land  in respect of their legality to force  ©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™ and Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwanna Land to comply with the domestic law of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which, since at least the 10th of January 1920, has been an illegal practice under International Law within the trading name ‘Australia’.
    1. The commonwealth of Australia is an Independent Sovereign State Nation and, as such, is a Member State of the United Nations. As such, the United Kingdom cannot be Australia’s colonial master. These facts cannot be questioned.
    2. However, those claiming to represent the State, and hence, possess the power of government of and over the Australian people rely for that power on a current Act of domestic law of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain (An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia) which, under international laws, (Charter of the United Nations Article 2 paras, 1 & 4 and resolutions 2131[XX] 1965, and 2625 [XXV] 1970) cannot be validly applied in the Independent Sovereign State Nation Australia.
    3. Additionally those same individuals have each sworn and subscribed an oath of allegiance to Queen Elizabeth II in the Sovereignty of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.
    4. Under such circumstances international law rules that the expression of government and representation of the state reverts to the sovereign people.
    5. The Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia being a colonial Act (law of subjugation) does not contain any elements of sovereignty or of civil rights. History clearly records that in international law, Australia moved from being a British colony/Dominion under the sovereignty of the Monarch of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and that this occurred on October 1 1919. The covenant of the League of Nations became part of international law on January 10, 1920 with Australia as one of the 29 foundation member states. Australia’s sovereign nation status was guaranteed under article X of the Leagues covenant. The Treaty of Versailles and hence the covenant of the League of Nations was written into Australian law via the treaty of the Peace act.
    6. Sovereignty over the Australian constitution lies not with the queen but with the United Kingdom government.
    7. Concealed forces, in a manner signaled prophetically by Sir Geoffrey Butler through a section of his comment article XXVI in the same original copy for the League of nation Covenant ensured that Australia continued to be governed as if it had remained a colony of the united kingdom.
    8. Letters patent of 1984 issued by the Queen of Australia under the great seal of Australia and the keeper of the royal seals, Lord Huntington, has advised that only the Queen of the United Kingdom can issue Letters Patent covering the constitution of the commonwealth of Australia. The Queen of Australia is considered to be a legal entity separate from the Queen of the United Kingdom and possesses no legal authority whatsoever. The result of this is that the Governor General who is appointed by a Queen of Australia, cannot give assent to any law created under the constitution.
    9. The enactment of valid laws under the current system of government in Australia is not possible.
    10. Equally the people of Australia have never been provided with an opportunity to devise and agree to be governed under a constitution of their own.
    11. But at one minute after Australia achieved sovereignty, British Australian and International Law all dictate that the United Kingdom was a power foreign to Australia and that as such its colonial laws may no longer be legitimately applied to the Australian people. For the situation to be otherwise constitutes an affront to the principle of independence and self determination.
    12. Cleary at the instant when Australia achieved independence any and all Imperial law relating to Australia including the Constitution Act became ‘frozen’ into redundant. Such law does not even need to be repealed, it just ‘died’.
    13. As Callinan J. Points out, a”…ruling that the evolutionary process is complete…would change the law” Resulting in adjustment and modifications “with respect to peoples’ rights, status and obligations”. Clearly, irrespective of when it was that the peoples of Australia achieved independence, at that time they gained the status of a free peoples and a right of self determination. A right which has been denied by those who were and are, even now, under an obligation to effect the principle of self determination on the peoples behalf.
    14. That this has not happened has clearly resulted in a continuing act of political aggression on the people of Australia which is (under Article 2 Paragraphs 1 and 4 UN Charter, strengthened by resolutions 2131 [XX] of December 21, 1965 and 2625 [XXV] of October 24, 1970), an offence under International Law.
    15. The conclusion which must therefore be reached is that under the UN Charter and various resolutions valid and legal government does not exist in Australia.
    16. Accordingly, this Notice has been prepared and presented by the sovereigns who rightfully represent the Independent Sovereign Nation State of the Commonwealth of Australia.
  3.  Be advised that having demonstrated that because the Australian government does not validly represent the sovereigns of Australia then representation in matters of State has therefore reverted directly to the people. Representatives in the name of the Sovereign People of Australia, acting as The State, submitted an Application and Petition to the International Court of Justice at The Hague.
    1. This Application dated June 9 1999 was submitted under Article 36 of the Statute as ‘A Matter Between THE SOVERIEGN PEOPLE OF AUSTRALIA and THE PARLIAMENT AND GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.’ As this submission was in its final stages of assembly news arrived that, despite the evidence presented establishing that the body masquerading as the Australian Government did not meet the requirements necessary to represent the Sovereign People of Australia, that is, the Commonwealth of Australia.
  4.  Be advised that Australia declared to the World that the Commonwealth of Australia was an Independent, Sovereign Nation Member State of the League of Nations, with EQUAL Nation Status as the United Kingdom, and as such Australian People were, at the least from the 10th of January 1920, FREE FROM THE IMPOSITION OF ANY BRITISH LAW – including “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK)”.  This was written into Australia law on September 14, 1945 via the Charter of the United Nations Act 1945.
  5.  Be advised that  from October 1, 1919, or January 10, 1920, or at the very least, June 26, 1945, it became an offence under International Law to enforce foreign law, including the Domestic Law of the United Kingdom upon the Australian people who are the government of the country, not the parliaments.  To do so is to commit an act of treason against the Australian PeopleNOTE: The “Australian” Judiciary, Police and Body Corporate ‘local governments’ political systems within Australia itself have problems in recognizing these facts. This refusal to accept these facts apparently stems from an illegitimate and or private/personal agendas and intent by the Judiciary, Police, alleged governments and political systems to oblige the United Kingdom Parliament and Monarch in their continued raping and pillaging of the natural wealth, resources and energy of the Sovereign of Gondwana Land people.
  6.  Be advised that the Full Bench of the High Court of Australia has ruled that International Treaties are binding on all courts within Australia. (see Teoh)
  7.  Be advised that the Full Bench of the High Court of Australia has ruled that the United Kingdom is a power foreign to Australia. (See Sue v Hill, 1999.)
  8.  Be advised that the Full Bench and High Court of Australia ruled June 23 1999 that the United Kingdom was a ‘foreign power’ for the purposes of Section 44 of the Commonwealth Constitution when the Constitution is the legislation of the Parliament of the United Kingdom alone. In other words, the High Court ruled that the United Kingdom is a foreign power under its own legislation. Therefore the Australian State Governments and Federal Government of Australia remain extensions of the United Kingdom Government.
    1. As a consequence valid sovereignty over the Commonwealth of Australia moved from the Queen of the United Kingdom to the Australian people. That is to the Commonwealth of Australia. A change in sovereignty necessarily results in a break in legal continuity however politicians failed to create the legal instrument necessary to bridge the legal void created through this change in sovereignty.
    2. Therefore within Australia, working for the Government of the United Kingdom have repeatedly acted to conceal the political and legal truth that the sovereign people constituting the Commonwealth of Australia have been denied the right to self-determination.
    3. Therefore those assuming the role of the Australian Government, even in the face of the most extreme action which the sovereign people may take, refuse to take responsibility in person, however now you are all personally responsible, unlimited responsibility.
  9.  Be advised that the Australian governments and corporations are INVALID;
    1. From the time that the Commonwealth of Australia became an Independent Sovereign Nation State, the individuals assuming power in both the State (Provincial) and Federal Governments and within the judiciaries and bureaucracies have done so without being granted the necessary legitimate power, that is, the necessary authority, by the people.
    2. Instead they have continued to accept their appointment to positions of power, in accord with the terms, conditions and restrictions defined in the Act, from the Queen of the United Kingdom, that is, the Government of the United Kingdom.
  10.  Be advised that YOU and every Australian Parliamentary representatives, ministers, public servants, councilors, council staff have been forced to commit an Act of Treason everyday of your working lives;
    1. Before one may assume their seat in the Australian Parliament / Government every member and Senator must swear an Oath or Affirmation to the Monarch in the sovereignty of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. “There is no provision for any deviation from this constitutional requirement. No Member may take part in proceedings of the House until sworn in. “(Parliament Research Office, June 10, 1999).
    2. The Oath and Affirmation appear as the Schedule to clause nine of the Act, the Constitution, but because it lies outside the Constitution it may not be altered under the provision of section 128 of the Constitution. The only authority which may, perhaps, have the power to alter this condition is the owner of the Act, the Parliament of the United Kingdom. However, there exists an argument that since the Act is actually legally redundant no authority may initiate any alteration whatsoever.
    3. Attention was drawn to the unsatisfactory state of affairs when on June 23 1999 the Full Bench of the High Court of Australia ruled that the United Kingdom was a power foreign to Australia.
    4. The nation is functioning under the invalid Constitution contained in the Act but also because at times both the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Australian Governments have attempted to conceal problems through the initiation and invalid implementation of legislation subordinate to or in addition to, the original Act. Such actions have effectively compounded the invalidity of the governmental structure and the laws being effected in Australia. Even the casual student will realize that the situation has now passed being ridiculous and has become ludicrous.
  11.  Be advised that it is abundantly clear that the political and legal system currently operating in Australia is not only aggressive to the sovereignty of the Australian people but is totally offensive to international law. It is offensive to the right of the Australian people to enjoy self-determination, the fundamental principle on which the United Nations has been established. And since the Charter of the United Nations has been written into Australia Law, those assuming power to govern the nation to do so in defence to not only international law, but also the laws of their own land.    
  12.  Be advised that even though Parramatta City Council are using the illegal Constitution of Australia as your authority, FACT REMAINS local council is not recognised as ‘local government’ meaning no local council anywhere in Australia has legal standing! This is a direct violation and the Parramatta City Council are operating outside the law! Refer to the 3/9/1988 Referendum ‘119A Each State shall provide for the establishment & continuance of a system of local government with local government bodies elected in accordance with the laws of the State & empowered to administer and to make bylaws for their respective areas in accordance with the laws of the state.’ The referendum result was over 87% voted “NO”. No system of local government may be lawfully established or continued within the Commonwealth of Australia or within any states. The entire 1988 referendum was REJECTED by the will of the people. 1989 the Hawke Government introduced the Local Government Act 1989 (1993 in some states) in criminal contempt of the Australian people, the constitution and the referendum. Therefore Parramatta City Council are Treachery, Human rights crimes against humanity, economic deprivation, operating a slavery system, trespass, illegally and unlawfully seizing property, selling property, theft, debt bondage, blackmail, extortion, political persecution, interference of tribal sacred lands, unlawful rates and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under Gods Lore/Law, Common and International Law, Aboriginal, Originee and Maori (Kawa, Tikanga, Customary) Lore/Law everyday.
    1. Local Councils are PRIVATE
    2. Parramatta City Council is a PRIVATE COMPANY ABN 49907174773 masquerading as a government
    3. Parramatta City Council is NOT Constitutionally lawful
    4. Parramatta City Council by-laws and Statutes apply only to their own staff
    5. Parramatta City Council knows that Common Law prevail
    6. The very fact that there is a move to have Councils recognised is PROOF that they are NOT recognised
    7. Robert Lang did not rebut these claims, whatsoever, therefore these claims are unrebutted, accepted and honoured.
  13.  Be advised that Local Councils are ILLEGAL-UNLAWFUL. They are nothing more than a Body Corporate pretending to be Government. While “governments” may have gained their “legitimacy” with the excuse of various “constitutions” and /or by majority „vote of the populace, (so-called “democracy”)  Local governments (councils) have: NO LEGITIMACY – NO CONSTITUTION – NO HEAD OF POWER. The following are NOT based on assumptions,  but “officially” admitted FACTS.
    1. Fact 1 The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 proclaimed and Gazetted Constitution is Australia’s basic law. Quote: The Federal Attorney General’s Department Constitutional Policy Unit, 9th January 2002;“the current Chief Justice of the High Court, the Hon. Murray Gleeson, AC, noted the status of the Constitution as Australia’s basic law (published as) The Rule of Law and the Constitution. ABC books, 2000, on page 6 “In Australia, unlike the United Kingdom, we have a basic law, the Constitution, which defines and limits the power of the Parliament to alter the Law” and on Friday 21st June,2002 in the NSW Parliament Theatrette, during the „Australian Conference on Bill of Rights, the acting Attorney-General, (the First Law Officer in Australia), Darryl Williams, AM,QC,MP has said this, about :“Constitutional and Common Law Protections”:
      The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 proclaimed and Gazetted Australian Constitution specifically protects certain rights and freedoms. These include -trial by jury-freedom of religious associations-prohibition on discrimination on the basis of State residence-freedom of interstate commerce; and just terms for acquisition of property. And “WE HAVE THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND”. We have our own unique written Constitution which provides both express and implied protection of rights.
    2. Fact 2 The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 proclaimed and Gazetted Australian Constitution DOES NOT recognise “local government.
    3. Fact 3 Attempts by the “government” to alter the constitution to recognize local government have failed TWICE. The last Referendum was held on the 3rd of September 1988.  87% of the population REJECTED the proposal for recognition of a third tier of “government”, namely, local “councils”.
    4. Fact 4 The result of any Referendum is LAW. Despite that clear unmistakable affirmation of the Constitution by the people “of the Commonwealth” of Australia IN ALL STATES IN 1988 , the “government” (Hawke) introduced the Local Government Act 1989” (1993 in some states)
    5. Fact 5 All the bureaucrats, in every “council”, are relying on this ULTRA VIRES, NULL and VOID Act to justify their UNLAWFUL actions.
    6. Fact 6 Even if local “councils” “Governments” were legal, (which they are clearly not), they have no “right to levy any kind of TAX on anyone! Quote from a letter by Gary Friend (Queensland) to a local newspaper March 5th, 2001: “ John W. Howard, Peter H. Costello & Commissioner of Taxation Micheal J. Carmody all stated before the introduction of the infamous “Goods and Services Tax”, quote: local government COUNCIL RATES will attract NO GST because council rates are a TAX and we CAN’T TAX A TAX. Also the High Court of Australia decided that “STATE GOVERNMENTS COULDN’T RAISE ANY TAX, when the “State Excise on Fuel, Tobacco & Alcohol was removed.
    7. Fact 7 A large percentage of properties are held in “FEE SIMPLE”. By LAW these properties CANNOT be “levied” or “charged” under ANY description! (That was the very purpose of the creation of the FEE SIMPLE tenure! See High Court rulings on the subject)
    8. Fact 8 Since all law is contract we do not have to accept any offer to contract unless we want to. A “rates” Notice is not a bill requiring payment. It is a legal offer to contract that you can consent to or reject. Anybody can issue a legal offer to contract with you. Its legal basis for issue rests solely upon whether the recipient wants to pay it or not and/ or ignores it.”He who does not deny, admits.”· “He who fails to assert his rights has none.” · “He who does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it.” ·Some people avoid this trap by returning to sender unopened correspondence from sources they wish not to recognize or to have dealings with. Others open it and send a legal notice back asking for further details or declining it etc. Some of the Legal maxims that the legal profession use:-
    9. Fact 9 The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 proclaimed and Gazetted Constitution of Australia requires that State Government attends to its infrastructure. It gets the resources to do this from the Federal Government as it is unable to tax by law. As “councils” are not government they are relegated in operation into a state of being, not unlike that of, a sub-contractor to the State Government in providing services for which they receive state monies. As they are not government, and need to be somehow legally recognized in law, they are set up as businesses e.g. PARRAMATTA CITY COUNCIL (ABN 49907174773). As a business they can operate within business guidelines.They CHARGE you for services that the Constitution has already legally required the State Governments to provide you without taxes. When you use those services you are required to pay for them as they are NOT government services. Just as you have a right to choose to pay for a private hospital rather than use the free public hospital you can also “choose” to use a private business to provide your local infrastructure. You consent and choose the private business to undertake your local requirements by accepting and paying the demand on the rates notice or by ignoring it.(Remember, “He who does not deny, admits.”) Just by phoning your local “council” and speaking to someone about this or that you have accepted their “authority”. You have consented to do business with them. Remember querying the bill from your solicitor about paying for a phone call to ask him/her whether they got your fax etc? Recognition of authority is “deemed” to be consent.
    10. Fact 10 The “council” has no power over your property unless you consent! The concentration of power comes from a vacuum. The Constitutional power you have that you decide to ignore does not go away. It accumulates to whomever wishes to have it via the issuance of ignored/ uncontested/ lost claims.They can only do so with your consent in law therefore what they say and do with that consent compels you to their will even though it is against your conscience to do so. Many times they use bluff to compel you. Not even the ruling king or queen may enter your property without your permission but if you consent to have the decision of entry judged by someone else like a judge they can decide to let someone enter your property against your will because you have already given the permission and authority to someone else to make that decision. Of course all you had to say from the start was “I do not consent to anyone entering my property” and place signs out to that effect.
    11. Fact 11  All power in Australia rests in the hands of individual Australians and when used this power can rewrite the Constitution and direct the highest court of the land to your bidding!!!! THE POWER TO CHANGE THIS COUNTRY IS IN OUR HANDS GOD BLESS
  14. Be advised that under the LIEBER CODE ARTICLE 31: Under the ‘law of war’ ‘Lieber Code Article 31’ no purported illegal Government or Corporation can make a claim to the land unless it is being used for military purpose, therefore respondents have no claim to Rangihou Lands, Rangihou Sacred Burial Site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, Parramatta Gondwana Land, and all that abuts Rangihou in the boundary of any and all Parramatta’s Land Wards, including but not limited to; Arthur Phillip, Caroline, Chisholm, Elizabeth Macarthur, Lachlan Macquarie and Woodville.
  15.  Be advised that if the council choose to continue following the illegal Constitution of Australia SECT 6 of the British “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)”, it states:
    1. Section 6. “The Commonwealth” shall mean the Commonwealth of Australia as established under this Act. “The States” shall mean such of the colonies of New South Wales, New Zealand, Queensland, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia, and South Australia, including the northern territory of South Australia, as for the time being are parts of the Commonwealth, and such colonies or territories as may be admitted into or established by the Commonwealth as States; and each of such parts of the Commonwealth shall be called “a State.”
    2. New Zealand being a so-called state of Australia has never been repealed, therefore all declarations, letters patents, treaties, standing orders, Charters & Instructions, International Protectorates, Common Law Doctrine issued to Maori are recognised in the Commonwealth of Australia.
  16.  Be advised that the He Wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni [The Declaration of Independence 1835] and ‘New Zealand United Tribes Flag of 1835’ are International Protectorates for the Pacific Islands, including Gondwana Land through the acknowledgement of his Majesty’s Royal Protection in perpetuity (Letters Patent) and by the ‘New Zealand United Tribes Flag 1835’ endorsed by King William IV gazetted in the NSW Gazette Notice 17th August 1835.
  17.  Shall respect that we, the tribal sovereign proponents are men and woman of power and authority who are the sovereign land custodians/guardians and who attend to the tenets of the Lore-givers,  the Spirit Creatures and Creator beings of the Dreamtime and the covenants we have made with our Heavenly Father.
  18.  Shall respect tribal lore “Qui prior est tempore potior est jure – first in time is best in law”  which is still the lore, “FIRST IN TIME, FIRST IN RIGHT STRONGER IN RIGHT”, here in Gondwana Land, which is the first truest “Lore of the real earth” dating back thousands of years. This lore is strongly linked to the Serpents of Aboriginal Lore, which we also identify as The Rainbow Serpent through the trade routes and song-lines across our land.
  19. hall respect tribal lore “Superficies solo credit – what is attached to the land belongs to the land.” Darug and Eora clans have been and are still on their land, which incorporates the Cumberland Plain in Western Sydney, that stretches from Wisemans Ferry in the North down to around Camden in the south. Darug people also extended into the foothills of the Blue Mountains and the Hills District to the east – since the Dreaming began. Any additions to that land, such as buildings and roads, items, piers and jetties, belong to the country itself and the Darug and Eora peoples (Reference Map below Parramatta A Past Revealed Page 5). The Australian government and authors from Parramatta A Past Revealed, Terry Kass, Carol Liston, John McClymont confirm that the first inhabitants are the original peoples, therefore our law is the strongest in law and the Australian law is a ‘johnny come lately.”  “The truth is that we were here before the British. The truth is that we hold sovereignty and dominion over these lands. The truth is that there has been genocide and multiple crimes against humanity and massacres committed on this land.” Confirmation of these crimes is in 1800 Governor King issued a proclamation allowing any Aboriginal west of Parramatta to be ‘shot on sight’. [Page 22 Baludarri Wetland, Wetland Plan of Management].

    Darug 1788

    Darug Tribes 1788, Parramatta A Past Revealed Book

  20. Shall respect the Aboriginal rights case known as Mabo, whereby the High Court of Australia issued a judgment which was a direct overturning of terra nullius. In this case, the Court found that there was a concept of native title in common law. In 1996, The High Court in the Wik Decision stated that native title and pastoral leases could co-exist and that native peoples could use land for hunting and performing sacred ceremonies even without exercising rights of ownership. The court’s ruling in Mabo has enabled some Aboriginal peoples to reclaim limited territory appropriated under the doctrine of terra nullius. Reference December 2004 Noonkanbah people case, now recognised as the traditional owners of a 1,811 km2 (699 sq mi) plot of land in Western Australia. Be advised that Northern Territory land and coastline (40 per cent) is owned by Aboriginal peoples.
  21. he land was never purchased by anyone, as Parramatta was known as the Ruse Experiment with a plan to settle the district with FREE SETTLEMENT. Land that is today known as Rangihou Lands, Rangihou sacred burial site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands were all land grants to settlers in 1791 who were Sirius seamen i.e. Robert Webb and William Reid each granted 60 acres of land Rev Samuel Marsden 112 acres of land. Reference Parramatta A Past Revealed Page 32.Ruse Settelement Map
  22. Be advised that 1835 Governor Bourkeimplemented the doctrine of terra nullius by proclaiming that Indigenous Australians could not sell or assign land, nor could an individual person or group acquire it, other than through distribution by the   The first decision of the New South Wales Supreme Court to make explicit use of the term terra nullius was R v Murrell and Bummaree (unreported, New South Wales Supreme Court, 11 April 1836, Burton J). Terra nullius was not endorsed by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council until the decision of Cooper v Stuart in 1889, some fifty three years later. However, historian Michael Connor has claimed that the concept was a STRAWMAN (Cestui Que Vie Act 1666):
    1. By the time of Mabo in 1992, terra nullius was the only explanation for the British settlement of Australia. Historians, more interested in politics than archives, misled the legal profession into believing that a phrase no one had heard of a few years before was the very basis of our statehood, and Reynolds’ version of our history, especially The Law of the Land, underpinned the Mabo judges’ decision-making.
  23. Be advised that no purported or actual “court” within the Commonwealth of Australia” has a legal capacity to hear any matter and or execute any judgment against SOVEREIGN PROPONENT(S) in respect of any matter brought before any “Court” if that “court” cannot or does not provide to SOVEREIGN PROPONENT(S) lawful and examinable evidence of its’ :
    1. Legal basis, and,
    2. Head of Authority, and,
    3. Head of Power,  which today stands unrebutted.
  24.  Are advised that pursuant to the Affidavits and Notices of Rebuttal, at no point in time have the respondents or Parramatta City Council (PCC) addressed the facts or demands or; Satisfied the valid concerns regarding;
    1. Source of power, and,
    2. Head of power, and,
    3. Authority of the AUSTRALIA over sovereign proponents.
  25.  Be advised that the evidence required to prove the Legal Basis, Head of Authority and Head of Power of any “court” in Australia which is proposing to hear any matter concerning SOVEREIGN PROPONENT(S) must:
    1. be compliant to Australia’s’ obligations under the Charter of the United Nations, and,
    2. be compliant with Australia’s’ obligations pursuant to International Treaties to which Australia is a Party, and,
    3. be compliant with International Law, and,
    4. be provided in document form to the satisfaction of SOVEREIGN PROPONENT(S), which today stands unrebutted.
  26. Be advised that neither “Australia” nor its agents, assigns, officers nor representatives have the authority to:
    1. exercise any authority under any Act or Law against or in respect of SOVEREIGN PROPONENT(S) which is subordinate to the Act “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 (UK)as:
    2. this Act is an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain and Northern Ireland which has its’ seat of power at Westminster, London, England, and,
    3. The Act “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)” is ultra vires to commonwealth and states and territories of Australia.
    4. No officer or agent of the Commonwealth of Australia or any State and or Territory of the Commonwealth of Australia can exercise any authority derived from the British Act “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia” (a Law owned by a power foreign to the Commonwealth of Australia) over a Sovereign, Independent, Original man, woman or child.
  27. Be advised that No officer, agent, assignee, representative nor employee of “AUSTRALIA” has the authority to:
    1. exercise any authority under any Act or Law which is subaltern to the Act “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 (UK)as:
    2. this Act is an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain and Northern Ireland which has its’ seat of power at Westminster, London, England, and,
    3. The Act “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)” is ultra vires to Commonwealth of Australia.
  28.  Be advised that all “Courts” at ALL levels including the ILLEGITIMATE and ILLEGAL “Courts” of Australia are obliged to protect our rights:
    1. in accordance with Divine Law, and,
    2. in accordance with Natural Law, and,
    3. in accordance with the Common Law, and,
    4. in accordance with Statute Law: in that order.
  29. Be advised that Federal Judges must be appointed by the Governor-General and State Judges by the State Governors who must have been appointed by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second. However, Privy Council and the Foreign & Commonwealth Office in London confirm that the Queen does not and cannot appoint the Governor General nor the Governors because she is the Head of State of the United Kingdom and has no executive powers exercisable in the Commonwealth of Australia.  Therefore, any appointments made by these false representatives of the Queen are also fraudulent and those “Judges” have no authority or jurisdiction, whatsoever.
    1. In support of these claims letter from Foreign & Commonwealth Office dated 11 June 2003 states “The Queen, in her role as Head of State of the United Kingdom and as such advised by British ministers has no executive power exercisable within the Commonwealth of Australia. The monarch’s role as Queen of Australia is separate from her role in relation to the United Kingdom and in its fulfillment she is advised by Australian Ministers.”
    2. In support of these claims letter from the  Attorney Generals Department dated 7 May 2001 whereby J Henke requests a copy of ‘the empowering document, documents or legislation issued by the United Kingdom Government or Parliaments empowering the Queen of Australia to use the Royal Prerogative granted to the Queen of the United Kingdom in particular the Royal Sign Manual, response states “no such document as described by you in your request exists, pursuant to section 24A of the Act.”
  30.  Be advised that The United Nations International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Part 1, and Article 1, Section 1 states:
    1. “All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”
  31.  Be advised that Charter of the United Nations, Article 2, Sections 1, 2, and 4 state:
    1. (Section 1) The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.
    2. (Section 2) All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.
    3. (Section 4) All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
  32. Be advised that for any “Court” which is convened pursuant to any “law” given “Royal Assent” under the provisions of the British Act entitled “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK) to hear any matter against SOVEREIGN PROPONENT(S), as an Independent, Individual, Sovereign is to breach Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations and to commit and Act of War against SOVEREIGN PROPONENT(S).
  33. Be advised that from the John Bouvier’s Revised Sixth Edition, 1856 A Law Dictionary, “Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather, should dismiss the action”. This is governed by common law jurisdiction and  ©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™ with equitable remedy by estoppels in matters of commerce pursuant to the 1882 Bills of Exchange Act, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, December 1948, natural organic universal natural law.
  34. Be advised that all the above items of International Law, or International Agreements, or International Treaties have been signed by the Government of Australia including the Treaty of Versailles 1919 and hence the covenant of the League of Nations also written into Australian Law.
  35. Be advised that various past and the present Executive Governments of Australia, as the purported servants of the people who constitute the Commonwealth of Australia, have signed International Treaties and Covenants with the intent that committal to these Treaties and Covenants (which SOVEREIGN PROPONENT(S) relies upon in respect of his defense in these matters) give rise to a legitimate expectation that these Treaties and Covenants have the purpose of protecting SOVEREIGN PROPONENT(S) s rights pursuant to these Treaties and Covenants.
  36. Be advised that these Covenants and Treaties have also been entered into Australian Law under Acts bearing titles similar to the titles of the International Agreements. (E.g., The  Geneva Convention Act, The Charter of the United Nations Act, The Human Rights Commission Act etc.)
  37. Be advised that  for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, or the Government of any State or Territory of the Commonwealth of Australia to permit, encourage and or allow the practice by Australian “Courts” to exercise, enforce or other wise use any law which stems from any British Act – regardless of when that Act was enacted – is to COMMIT TREASON against the Sovereign Originee/ Tribal guardians of Gondwana Land.
  38. Be advised that any officer or agent of the Commonwealth of Australia, or of any State and or Territory of the Commonwealth of Australia, who exercises any authority derived from the British Act “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia” or any other Act of any other foreign power over any Independent Originee/Aboriginal and or non-Originee Individual Sovereign man, woman or child is in breach of the rights (both Civil, Political, Human and Social) – as bound in the various International Treaties to which Australia is a State Party of that Independent Originee/Aboriginal or non-Originee Individual Sovereign man, woman or child.
  39. Be advised that The Journal of Captain Arthur Phillip, leader of the first fleet, shows his Commission and Instructions under the Act of Parliament Establishing the Colony state, in respect of “Aboriginal” People, the following:
    1. to endeavour by every possible means to open an intercourse with the natives, and to conciliate their affections, enjoining all Our subjects to live in amity and kindness with them. And if any of Our subjects shall wantonly destroy them, or give them any unnecessary interruption in the exercise of their several occupations, it is Our will and pleasure that you do cause such offenders to be brought to punishment.” 
  40. Be advised that respondents and Parramatta City Council have not rebutted the claims that:
    1. That the term LOT, when used in reference to the Torrens Titling system is an analogy for the phrase Location of Title.
    2. That the Location of Title in a Deposited Plan does not refer to the land as no title can be given lawfully in respect of Title over land upon this island continent due to the fact the Crown has never had nor held absolute title in order to vest title to or in another.
    3. Fee Simple is a contract between the Queen and her subjects.  There is no such entity as an Australian citizen, you are a British subject UNLESS you agree to be an Australian citizen, and the contract is perpetual. Therefore if you claim British subject status, then YOUR FEE SIMPLE STATUS REMAINS.
    4. That at all times absolute title over the lands on this continent has remained with the Sovereign Tribes of this Continent
    5. That the Sovereign Tribes of this continent have never KNOWINGLY acquiesced their Title nor dominion over their lands to the Crown in any form nor style.
    6. That to forcibly remove the Sovereign Tribes of this continent ‘Sovereignty over their Tribal lands by refusing to recognise their Sovereignty in favor of the Crowns’ fraudulent claim to title is to commit ethnic cleansing of the Tribal moiety from the records and is an act of war against them which violates respected international law.
    7. That the Parramatta City Council have NO PROOF OF LAND OWNERSHIP or a TRUE BILL OF SALE or LAND TREATY from the Sovereign Darug Nation or the Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwanna Land or the Sovereign Maori Nga Puhi Tribe, specifically pertaining to Rangihou Lands, Rangihou Reserve, the sacred burial site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, Parramatta.
  41. Shall respect that the area of land namely ‘Rangihou’, was named and referenced ‘Rangihou’, among other things, for the re-establishment of a Seminary for the education, residence and occupation of Nga Puhi Maori at Parramatta.  The land was named ‘Rangihou’ meaning “New Heaven or New Horizon” due to the relationship between the Reverend Samuel Marsden and Maori, in particular with the Chief Ruatara from ‘Rangihoua’, Chief Te Ruki Kawiti from Kawakawa and the Paramount Nga Puhi Chief Hongi Hika from the Hokianga.
    1. In support of the land offerings to Maori Nga Puhi Chiefs Ruatara and Te Ruki Kawiti at Parramatta, Hongi Hika made an offering to Reverend Samuel Marsden, the Church of England and the Missionary Society in 1819 and granted land consisting of 13,000 acres which was sealed in Rangihoua on the 4th day of November 1819. This is evidence of the reciprocal nature of Maori and further proof of the land gifting transaction of ‘Rangihou’ in Parramatta between Maori Nga Puhi Chiefs and Rev Samuel Marsden took place.
  42.  Shall respect Baludarri and the land area Baludarri Wetlands as it was named in his memory as Baludarri who was a Burramattagal Elder who befriended Governor Phillip and assisted with translation during expeditions further west. Baludarri had his canoe destroyed by the convicts, therefore he speared a man near kissing point as payback, and was thereafter outlawed by Governor Phillip. Without this canoe and livelihood, he found it hard to feed himself and his family and died soon after 1791.
  43.  Are again advised that you are not owners of the land and to date have not presented a TRUE BILL OF SALE as requested in numerous notices of rebuttal.  Respondents and the Parramatta City Council shall be reminded that the Report of the Select Committee of The House Of Commons On The Aborigines Wherever British Settlements Are Made” also states:
    It might be presumed that the native inhabitants of any land have an incontrovertible right to their own soil; it is a plain and sacred right which seems not to have been understood. Europeans have entered their borders uninvited, and when there, have not only acted as if they were the undoubted lords of the soil, but have punished the natives as aggressors if they have evinced a disposition to live in their own country.” TAKE NOTE that any argument drawn from a similar case, or analogy, avails in law.
  1. IN SUPPORT: The British Government, through the House of Commons further ratified the “He Wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni [The Declaration of Independence 1835]” and acknowledged the Confederation title to the soil and sovereignty as indisputable. This is in New Zealand, which under the Constitution of Australia SECT 6 of the British “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)” is a state of Australia, and so it stands in law here in Australia.
  2. N SUPPORT: Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 – Article 2 – Queen Victoria guaranteed to Aboriginal (Original, Originee’s, Maori) their sovereign right to the possession of all their lands, forests, fisheries and taonga as the legal, equitable and beneficial owners. This is in New Zealand, which under the Constitution of Australia SECT 6 of the British “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)” is a state of Australia, and so it stands in law here in Australia.

  •  Have undoubtedly committed an illegal act of trespass; as per your letter dated 5th March 2014 [Attachment 10] Greg Dyer stated “Any attempt to occupy Rangihou Reserve or the Morton St depot or both will be the illegal act of trespass”.  Greg Dyer and the actions of the Parramatta City Council are treasonous and you are intently wresting the law to your authority to do great harm to the sovereign proponents.  Respondents and the Parramatta City Council that you shall adhere to the Justice Willis, of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, on 16 September 1841 in a Judgment of the court stated:
    To elucidate so far as I am able the point for decision, I will first briefly trace the history of this colony and of the settlement of this district, at the same time remarking on the character which has been given of the aborigines; and in the second place, state so much of the acknowledged law of nations and the manner it has been acted upon with regard to Aborigines, as it seems to me to bear on the subject, adding a few notices of the manner in which uncivilized tribes have been treated within other British Colonies, and steps taken in Colonies where English law was in force. I will premise that policy, or impolicy of an existing system can avail nothing in the present instance. I can never permit the end to justify any undue means for its accomplishment. This may be policy and wisdom in a statesman, but it is little less than treason in a judge. He must not wrest the law to his authority, or do a great right through a little wrong.” TAKE NOTE that any argument drawn from a similar case, or analogy, avails in law.
  • Shall adhere to the Journal of the Judge Advocate General of the first fleet, Captain Collins 1796 admission of ownership of the land by the Originee Peoples and the fact that the Originee People had their own system of land ownership and title over their own private real estate’s prior to the arrival of the first fleet.
    Their spears and shields, their clubs and lines etc are their own property; they are manufactured by themselves and are the whole of their personal estate. But, strangely as it may appear, they have also their real estates. Bennelong, before he went to England and since his return, often assured me that the island Memel, called by us Goat Island, close by Sydney Cove, was his own property; that it was his fathers’, and that he should give it to Bygone, his particular friend and companion. To this little spot he appeared much attached and we have often seen him and his wife Barrangaroo feasting and enjoying themselves on it. He told us of other people who possessed this kind of hereditary property, which they retained undisturbed.” TAKE NOTE that any argument drawn from a similar case, or analogy, avails in law.
  • Shall adhere to the Address to Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The Aborigines Wherever British Settlements Are Made” , of July 1834, it was recorded that:
    The Kings’ “faithful Commons in Parliament assembled are deeply impressed with the duty of acting upon the principals of justice and humanity in the intercourse and relation of this country (the United Kingdom) with the native inhabitants of its colonial settlements – of affording them protection in the enjoyment of their civil rights, and of imparting to them that degree of civilization, and that religion with which Providence has blessed this nation; and it humbly prays, that his Majesty will take such measures and give such directions to the Governors and Officers of his Majesty’s’ settlements and plantations, as shall secure to the natives the due observance, and the protection of their rightspromote the spread of civilization amongst them, and lead them to the peaceful and voluntary reception of the Christian religion.” TAKE NOTE that any argument drawn from a similar case, or analogy, avails in law.
  • Shall adhere to the Report of the Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The Aborigines Wherever British Settlements Are Made” of July 1834, also states:
    “…it is the recollection of many living men that every part of this territory was the undisputed property of the aborigines.” TAKE NOTE that any argument drawn from a similar case, or analogy, avails in law.
  • Shall adhere to the Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The Aborigines Wherever British Settlements Are Made” also states:
    Much will depend on the manner in which this colony is considered to have been acquired, and this brings me in the second place to advert to the law of nations as acknowledged by the British Government, with regard to Colonial possessions. Colonies, says Mr Clark, in his summary of Colonial Law, and stated at the Bar by Mr. Barry, are acquired by conquest, by cession under treaty, or by occupancy. By occupancy where an uninhabited country is discovered by British subjects, and is upon such discovery, adopted or recognized by the British Crown as part of its possessions. In case a colony be acquired by occupancy, (he adds) the law of England then in being, is immediately and ipso facto in force in the new settlement. He further states, Australia or Van Diemens Land, were acquired by discovery or simple occupation. New South Wales was not, however, unoccupied, as we have seen, at the time it was taken possession of by the colonists, for, “a body of the aborigines appeared on the shore, armed with spears, which they threw down as soon as they found the strangers had no hostile intention.” This being the case, it does not appear there was any conquest, and it is admitted there has hitherto been cession under treaty. TAKE NOTE that any argument drawn from a similar case, or analogy, avails in law.
  • Be advised that Originee/Aboriginal/Tribal Sovereigns are NOT:
    1. part of any Australian or United Kingdom Colony (as defined in the “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 UK”), nor,
    2. a “possession of the Queen (of the United Kingdom)” (as defined by the “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 UK”), nor,
    3. subject to ANY purported or actual law or other legality enacted or otherwise given any power either:
      1. y the (United Kingdoms’) Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, or,
      2. y “Her heirs and or successors, or,
      3. y and or with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in the United Kingdom Parliament.
  •  Originee/Aboriginal/Tribal sovereigns are not, and never have been, lawfully subject to any authority or authorities of ANY foreign power and or powers including the invading British Monarchy, and or their heirs and or successors.
  •  Originee/Aboriginal/Tribal sovereign are not, and never have been, legally required to acknowledge, be subservient to, or be in any way obliging to and or governed by and or subservient to either:
    1. the Queen of the United Kingdom (whether Queen Victoria or Elizabeth II), nor,
    2. ANY of their “heir and or successors”, whether as the Monarch of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, or the purported monarch of the Commonwealth of Australia.
  •  Openly admitted in the letter dated 5th March 2014 [Attachment 10] that “Rangihou Reserve and the adjoining Council owned Land”. Henceforth your admitting to Treachery, Human rights crimes against humanity, economic deprivation, operating a slavery system, trespass, illegally and unlawfully seizing property, selling property, forcible possession, theft, debt bondage, blackmail, extortion, political persecution, interference of tribal sacred lands, unlawful rates and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under Gods Lore/Law, Common and International Law, Aboriginal, Originee and Maori (Kawa, Tikanga, Customary) Lore/Law.   Respondents and the Parramatta City Council shall adhere to the Report of the Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The Aborigines Wherever British Settlements Are Made” also states:
    This colony then stands on a different footing from some others for it was neither an unoccupied place, nor was it obtained by right of conquest and driving out the natives, nor by treaties. Indeed, as Mr Vattel very justly says, “whoever agrees that robbery is a crime, and that we are not allowed to take forcible possession of our neighbors property, will acknowledge without any further proof, that no nation has the right to expel another people from the country they inhabit in order to settle it herself.” TAKE NOTE that any argument drawn from a similar case, or analogy, avails in law. [Attachment 10]
  • Having stated in the letter dated 5th March 2014 [Attachment 10] that “Council has previously pointed out the flawed legal basis of the claim and demands that have been made” and “in Council’s opinion the notice has no legitimate legal basis”.  At no time have Robert Lang, Sue Coleman, Sue Weatherley, Greg Dyer, Directors, actors, officers, agents, public servants or the Parramatta City Council rebutted or produced the required documented evidence of the purported authority as requested in Notices of Rebuttal, Letters, Certificates of Non-response, Affidavits, Default Notices, Courtesy Notices, Invoices and Commercial Lien Claim which are all public notices. Notices are all listed in the introduction of this notice.
  • Are advised that pursuant to the Commercial Lien Claim Claim UCC1 – 2014-069-8362-5 and 2014-069-8361-8 dated 10th March 2014. All processes are those in which Constitutional and Commercial Rights of Commercial Lien Claim UCC1 – 2014-069-8362-5 and 2014-069-8361-8 total claim of obligation $1,184,945,000,000*oz (99.9% pure silver) are to date unrebutted and therefore accepted and honored. [Attachment 4 & 5]
  •  Have to date not provided documents required and necessary to prove the claim to jurisdiction over land and sovereign proponents including;
    1. Letters Patent establishing the “Office of Governor – General for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Irelands’ Colony of The Commonwealth of Australia” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.
    2. Letters Patent establishing the “Colonies of AUSTRALIA” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto
    3. Letters Patent establishing the “Office of Governor for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland’s Colonies of AUSTRALIA” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.
    4. The Writ of Commission for the “Governor General of The UK Colony of the Commonwealth of Australia” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.
    5. The Writ of Commission for the “Governor of The UK Colony of AUSTRALIA”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.
    6. The Writ of Commission for the “Chief Justice of the UK Colony of The Commonwealth of Australia”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.
    7. The Writ of Commission for the “Chief Justice of The UK Colony of AUSTRALIA”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.
    8. The Writ of Commission for the Police Commissioner of the “UK Colony of AUSTRALIA” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.
    9. The Writ of Commission for the “Minister of The Crown, known as the Attorney General” of The UK Commonwealth of Australia”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.
    10. The Writ of Commission for the “Senior Registrar of the Magistrates Court of The UK Colony of AUSTRALIA”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London
    11. All documents you personally, and individually, rely on to establish your “head of Power” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filed in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London
    12. All documents you personally, and individually rely on to establish “your claimed Authority” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filed in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London
    13. All documents you personally, and individually rely on to establish your claimed “Jurisdiction” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London
    14. A clear printed text of the oath sworn by any judicial officer who hears and or proposes to hear any matter in relation to Proponents’ matter.
    15. A current, legally binding, valid and legitimate Constitution; written and approved BY ALL the individual Independent Sovereign People of the independent entity Member State of the United Nations, Internationally recognized as “The Commonwealth of Australia”: expressing their freely given will of SELF- DETERMINATION under a Referendum (Plebiscite) conducted with the Authorised blessing of the International Community and International law; stating the source of that AUTHORITY, the date of APPROVAL and REGISTRATION with The Secretariat of The United Nations which shows acquiescence by the Australian people to any Domestic British legislation.”.
    16. A current, legally binding, valid and legitimate Constitution; written and approved BY ALL the individual Independent Sovereign People in the “STATE of AUSTRALIA” evidencing their freely expressed will of SELF- DETERMINATION to be subject to ANY “government”, “law”, “court”, “judge”, “magistrate”, “justice of the peace”, “police officer”, “prison officer”, “officer of the court”, “clerk of the court”, “agents”, or ANY other thing or person which is subaltern to the Parliament of the United Kingdom, proven by a Referendum (Plebiscite) conducted with the AUTHORISED blessing of the International Community and International law; stating the source of that AUTHORITY, the date of APPROVAL and REGISTRATION with The Secretariat of The United Nations.
    17. The Document whereby ALL the Individual Independent Sovereign People of the Commonwealth of Australia requested Queen Elizabeth the second, on the Throne, (re-established by ALL Sessions I & II William and Mary 1688), in The High Court of The Regent’s Parliament of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, to represent them as their Sovereign.
    18. Either:
      1. A current legal and binding Treaty, dated BEFORE the 10th of January 1920, between the Aboriginal Nations and Peoples of Australia and the Parliament of the United Kingdom of England and Ireland, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London, which Treaty evidences the acquiescence to British Colonial or other Law by the Independent, Sovereign, Indigenous Nations and Peoples of Australia, or,
      2. A current legal and binding Treaty, dated AFTER the 10th of January 1920, between the Aboriginal Nations and Peoples of Australia and the Colonial Government of Australia and or the Governments of the States of the Commonwealth of Australia, which Treaty evidences the acquiescence to Australian Statutory law and or British Colonial and or other law by the Independent, Sovereign, Indigenous Nations and Peoples of Australia.
  •  Have to date not provided documents or evidence of the purported authority of Australia and or the court or courts it is proposed will hear these matters to proponents complete satisfaction;
    1. Written permission from the United Nations to use Foreign Law, including British Domestic Law, in contravention of Article 2: paragraphs 1 and 4 of the United Nations Charter of 1945;
    2. Written permission from the League of Nations to use Foreign Law in the Commonwealth of Australia in direct contravention of Articles I, X and XX of the League of Nations Covenant of 1919.
    3. Permissions, in writing, from The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland Parliament to continue to use United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland Law in the Independent Sovereign Nation State of The Commonwealth of Australia, Assented to, and Duly Signed and Sealed, under The Great Seal of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, by King George the Fifth, and Counter-Signed by The Lord High Chancellor of The High Court of Parliament of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland; and
    4. Including an Authentic, Certified Copy of Documentation evidencing the Registration of same by The Office of the Clerk of The Crown in Chancery of The High Court of The Parliament of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland at Westminster, prior to January 10, 1920.
  •  Have to date not provided clear written evidence of the freely expressed permission by ALL the Individual Independent Sovereign People of The Commonwealth of Australia, for the continued use of Foreign Colonial Law, within:
    1. The Commonwealth of Australia, and,
    2. the State of AUSTRALIA, and,
    3. within the Boundary of the land area within the continent of Australia, after January 10, 1920; (when clearly ALL FOREIGN LAW (Colonial, Imperial or otherwise) was deemed to be ABROGATED and ultra virus with respect of Australia at International Law under the TERMS AND CONDITIONS of Membership to the League of Nations, under The Covenant of The League of Nations Covenant 1919, Upon the several Independent Nations Entity States signing The Covenant at the Peace Conference at Versailles.
      1. Both The Commonwealth of Australia and The United Kingdom of Great Britain and) Ireland were ORIGINAL Independent Signatory Nation Member States.
  •  Have to date not provided clear written Certified evidence of Full General Assembly of The United Nations’ Revocation of its Resolution 2625 (XXV) of October 24, 1970 Declaring ALL British Acts (both Colonial and Imperial) as legal and binding on the Individual, Independent Sovereign people of Australia.
  •  Have to date not provided evidence that;
    1. All Constitutions (including Australian 1900 UK & WA, SA, Vic, Tas, NSW and Queensland).
    2. The Statute of Westminster 1931,
    3. Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942, and,
    4. The Australian Acts (UK and CTA), are not NULL AND VOID in respect of the Commonwealth of Australia.
  •  Have to date not provided full written Certified evidence of WHY the British Colony of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of England and Ireland, assented by the Regent on the Throne in the High Court of THAT Parliament at Westminster, being a FOREIGN ACT OF A FOREIGN NATION, IS NOT registered at the United Nations in Geneva nor New York, as a RECIPROCAL MUTUAL TREATY which is required under international Law before it (as a Foreign Law) can be exercised within the land of the Commonwealth of Australia.
  •  Have to date not provided full written Certified evidence that any other “court” other than the purported High Court of Australia, so as to facilitate this matter being determined by the only purported “Australian” court which is purportedly authorised to hear challenges to the purported “Australian Constitution” and or defenses taken pursuant to International Treaties, pursuant to Section 80 of the “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK” , set this matter aside for hearing by the purported High Court of Australia, which, pursuant to the particulars of this INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION, is the ONLY purported “court” in Australia which might have the purported authority to hear this matter under “Australia’s” purported “Constitution” (i.e.: the “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK”).
  •  Accepts that due to all affidavits and notices being unrebutted, accepted and honoured, the purported Parliament of Australia, its’ agents, assigns, officers and representatives accept, acknowledge and comply with proponents rights as Original Tribal Sovereigns on Gondwanna Land (Australia).
  •  Accepts that due to all affidavits and notices being unrebutted, accepted and honoured, that the purported Parliament of Australia, its’ agents, assigns, officers and representatives accept, acknowledge and comply with sovereign proponents and do not interfere with the rights of the sovereign proponents  to exercise their Sovereign rights within and upon their Sovereign land, Gondwanna Land (Australia).
  •  Have at all times been;
    1. given the opportunity to cure,
    2. given the opportunity to resolve,
    3. given the opportunity to act in oneness,
    4. given the opportunity to fix a wrong and make right,
    5. given the opportunity to de-manifest a direct intervention,
    6. given the opportunity to show yourselves ‘in the light’ directly to the creator,
    7. given the opportunity to stop opposing the desire to live in peace and harmony on our lands and sacred sites,
    8. given the opportunity to demonstrate a proper defence against all facts upon which THIS INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION NOTICE is founded.
  •  Have accepted, agreed and honoured by tacit admission (silence) the following;
    1. THAT the facts as stated in the NOTICES OF WANT OF JURISDICTION are true and correct.
    2. THAT the demands arising from those facts are proper and reasonable.
    3. THAT the Demands of the NOTICES OF WANT OF JURISDICTION must be complied with.
    4. THAT proponents are entitled to costs and damages for any breach of proponents rights as stated by the Schedule of Fees forwarded to the Office of the Premier of AUSTRALIA and Commercial Lien Claim.
    5. THAT any public or private harassment and intimidation of proponents and our families and community by respondents and the Parramatta City Council’s officers ” its’ agents, assigns, officers, actors and or representatives under direction of the Queen of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of England and Ireland in her illegal purported capacity of the “Queen of Australia” will be seen as an act of terrorism and charged under the international jurisdiction, under the Common Law Court of Justice Australia.
    6. THAT respondents and the Parramatta City Council understands, and accepts that actions against ” its’ agents, assigns, officers, actors and or representatives, would be taken against those officers personally, unlimited.
    7. THAT if respondents and the Parramatta City Council continue to participate in perpetrating this fraud against any of the proponents after being made aware of the International Jurisdiction will be in breach of a Human Rights violation and an act of terrorism and charged under international jurisdiction by merely a citizen’s arrest, and in due course will be charged in the illegal INVALID JUDICIAL SYSTEM, The International Court and ICAC for Human Rights abuse as “no one is above the reach of this commission: ICAC Megan Latham warns” (Press Release 28th August 2014 The Daily Telegraph).
    8. THAT respondents and the Parramatta City Council are aware by way of a parallel situation, the report of the International Criminal Tribunal (Yugoslavia) reveals that, this Tribunal considered human rights abuses as more serious than war crimes and placed ‘economic deprivation’ at the upper end of the penalty scale. Any person directly involved in an illegal act of economic deprivation (for which the United Nation’s penalty scale is from five (5) to twenty-five (25) years). You should now take the time to consider your position, as you have been given notice and as an individual with access to the Internet, telephone and postal service if you continue to act in any manner against a sovereign, you will be denied any defence as to your lack of knowledge of the facts outlined herein.
    9. THAT respondents and the Parramatta City Council are aware by way of a parallel situation that, in matters involving human rights, individuals are considered to be solely responsible for their actions and the “I was only doing my job”, Nuremberg defences of ‘acting on advice’, ‘acting under direction’, ‘acting under orders’ or any justification which involves a ‘superior authority’ (such as an unsafe court decision) does not present as an acceptable defence.
    10. THAT respondents and the Parramatta City Council have no authority to sell land to anyone, under Australia’s invalid and void invalid illegal Constitution.  That includes, but not limited to Rangihou Lands, Rangihou sacred burial site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, Parramatta.
    11. THAT proponents are entitled to costs and damages for any breach of proponents lands, including Rangihou Lands, Rangihou sacred burial site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, Parramatta, stated herein as afforded by the Schedule of Fees and Commercial Lien Claim forwarded to Robert Lang, Sue Coleman, Sue Weatherley, John Chedid, Greg Dyer, Parramatta City Council and the Office of the Premier of the AUSTRALIA.
    12. THAT respondents and the Parramatta City Council is aware by way of a parallel situation of the CRIMES ACT – Treachery, Human rights crimes against humanity, economic deprivation, operating a slavery system, trespass, illegally and unlawfully seizing property, selling property, forcible possession, theft, debt bondage, blackmail, extortion, political persecution, interference of tribal sacred lands, unlawful rates and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under Gods Lore/Law, Common and International Law, Aboriginal, Originee and Maori (Kawa, Tikanga, Customary) Lore/Law are all crimes under the Crimes Act. All crimes against the laws of the Commonwealth must be by jury. Paragraph 80 of the Australian Constitution states, “The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the Commonwealth shall be by jury …” This makes it impossible for politicians to use the stooges they have appointed to the High Court to sidetrack justice.
    13. THAT respondents and the Parramatta City Council are aware by way of a parallel situation of CITIZEN’S ARREST – Every Australian can effect a citizen’s arrest, even of the Prime Minister, simply by placing a hand on the shoulder and saying, “You are under arrest. I charge you with Treachery, Human rights crimes against humanity, economic deprivation, operating a slavery system, trespass, illegally and unlawfully seizing property, selling property, forcible possession, theft, debt bondage, blackmail, extortion, political persecution, interference of tribal sacred lands, unlawful rates and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under Gods Lore/Law, Common and International Law, Aboriginal, Originee and Maori (Kawa, Tikanga, Customary) Lore/Law.   You must accompany me to the police station so the charges can be lodged to have you brought before the courts to determine your guilt or innocence.” There the complaint must be recorded and passed on for due process.
    14. THAT respondents and the Parramatta City Council are subject to investigation and prosecution in ICAC Commission regarding Treachery, Human rights crimes against humanity, economic deprivation, operating a slavery system, trespass, illegally and unlawfully seizing property, selling property, forcible possession, theft, debt bondage, blackmail, extortion, political persecution, interference of tribal sacred lands, unlawful rates and misappropriation of funds.
    15. No one in this executive arm of government…is above the reach of this commission: ICAC Megan Latham warns” (The Daily Telegraph 28th August 2014) and ICAC exposed the NSW Legislature as the most corrupt parliament in Australian history (The Daily Telegraph 29th August 2014).
  • THAT respondents and the Parramatta City Council have no authority at law to use any law which has its’ head of authority in either the;
    1. Parliament of the United Kingdom, and or,
    2. the Monarch of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, and or,
    3. Parliaments of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA or any state and or territory thereof, and or,
    4. the Queen of the Parliament of the United Kingdom in her purported and illegal capacity as the “queen of Australia”.
  • To date have not stated “who you are and how you acquired the said lands being Rangihou Lands, Rangihou sacred burial site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, Parramatta.”  This is your response and claim to our Affidavits and Notices of Rebuttals are today, still unrebutted, accepted and honoured by tacit admission.
  • Be advised that  ©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™ will seize and occupy Rangihou Lands, Rangihou sacred burial site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, Parramatta Gondwana Land, immediately after this notice is served. Any and all attempts by any ‘person’; ’agent’; ‘officer’; ‘citizen’; ‘servant’; ‘justice of the peace’; ‘police’ and (de facto) ‘actors’ of the illegal purported Parramatta City Council, any government corporation, body corporate, local government, CEO’s, Ministers, developers, contractors, staff, alleged owners of land to get in the way of the seizure and occupation will be placed under citizen’s arrest, police notified and charges laid under the illegal judicial court system for Treachery, Human rights crimes against humanity, economic deprivation, operating a slavery system, trespass, illegally and unlawfully seizing property, selling property, forcible possession, theft, debt bondage, blackmail, extortion, political persecution, interference of tribal sacred lands, unlawful rates and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under Gods Lore/Law, Common and International Law, Aboriginal, Originee and Maori (Kawa, Tikanga, Customary) Lore/Law charged under the Treason Act 1571 and Crimes Act 1961.
  • Take note that we “the Proponents” will not be withdrawing the Notice of seizure and recovery part thereof of the Total Estate Land and Property Claim of Obligation as per the Commercial Lien Claim (Bond) of premises: Rangihou Lands, Rangihou sacred burial site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, Parramatta.
  • Take note that the payment of the price of the land is held as a purchase of the land. Neither Robert Lang, Sue Coleman, Sue Weatherley, Greg Dyer, Think Planners, M. Dibben, Department of Environment or Planning or the Parramatta City Council have produced a true bill of sale or a receipt for the said lands or a land treaty for Rangihou Lands, Rangihou sacred burial site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, Parramatta. The mere recommendation of the land does not bind the vendor of it means all sales to date are VOID, ILLEGAL AND INVALID. No rule of law protects an alleged buyer who willfully closes his ears to information, or refuses to make inquiry when circumstances of grave suspicion imperatively demand it. If you have purchased this land not knowing that it was an illegal land transaction and are seeking compensation, you will need to address it with the seller.
  • Take note that that respondents and the Parramatta City Council are now instructed to immediately remove all assets from the said lands Rangihou Lands, Rangihou sacred burial site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, Parramatta, given 10 consecutive calendar days to remove assets, items, property, after this notice is served. Any and all assets, items, property remaining on the said lands will become the property of  ©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™.
  • Take note that, through the use of the Crown Defence Forces (United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand) including the NSW Police, Federal Police, Military Police, shall call the Crown to exercise its Feudal title, which binds the Crown to the reciprocal obligations of service and defence in protection of the Aboriginal (Maori, Originee, Original) people and their interests.  The Crown has guaranteed to Aboriginal (Maori, Originee, Original) people protection against any threat to their interests or wellbeing.  Furthermore we have also called upon the Fiducial Titles and obligation upon the Crown to exercise a high standard of care in the management of Aboriginal (Maori, Originee, Original) peoples lands, EStates, resources and funds under Letters Patent issued to Governor Hobson by Lord Normanby, so as to avert those evil consequences, for King William IV did make promise, “that He will not fail to avail Himself of every opportunity of showing His Goodwill”, Contra Proferentum rule.  The Westminster Parliament (UK) is legally bound to activate the standing orders of Lord Glenelg to Major Burke and the Letters Patent issued by Lord Normanby in defence of Aboriginal (Maori , Original, Originee’s) Sovereign rights.
  • Take note that “Something which is presented as the Truth but is not the whole Truth, is a deception.”
  • Take note that “we the proponents” are making Robert Lang, John Chedid, Sue Coleman, Sue Weatherley, Greg Dyer, Think Planners, M. Dibben, Department of Environment and Planning, Debbie Killian, Neville Davis and Parramatta City Council personally responsible and must we remind you that your protections are now gone as of 10th August 2013 as per the Papal Decree. It is known worldwide that the Vatican created a world trust using the birth certificates to capture the value of each individual’s future productive energy. Each state province and country in the fiat monetary system contributes their people’s value to this world trust identified by the social security number, tax file numbers or EIN numbers, maintained in the Vatican registry. Corporations worldwide, individuals became corporate fictions through the birth certificate; connected to the Vatican; to the Crown; to the Bar; to the Law; to the Judge; to the People; through the money; through the Vatican’s birth accounts; to the IMF; to the Treasury; to the Federal Reserve; to the Banks; to the People; through the loans; through the judges as the administrators; to the Sheriffs; or compensation. And judges administered the birth trust account in court matters favoring the courts and the banks acting as the presumed beneficiary, because they have not properly advised the true beneficiary of their own trust. Judges, Attorney’s, Bankers, law makers, law enforcement, all public officials, and public servants are now held personally liable for their confiscation of the true beneficiaries monies, homes, cars, assets, lands, false imprisonment, deception, harassment and conversion of their true beneficial trust fund. The law which governs corporations is the same as that which governs individuals [godless entities].
    1. In a nutshell The Most Holy Francis issued an Apostolic Letter on July 11 and effective 1 September 2013 that effectively strips away the immunity of all judges, attorneys, government officials and all entities established under the Roman Curia. Note: All corporations are established under the Roman Curia. All of these “persons” can now be held accountable for war crimes, crimes against humanity, for the unlawful restrictions of the liberties of the divine spirit incarnate (note: divine spirit embodies humanity); and for failure to settle the accounts and for continued prosecution of claims already settled, and so on.. This decree is causing mass resignations around the world.
      1) http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/motu_proprio/documents/papa-francesco-motu-proprio_20130711_organi-giudiziari.html
      2) http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.co.nz/2013/07/popes-decree-about-to-cause-mass.html
  • Take note that we “the Proponents” are making Robert Lang, John Chedid, Sue Coleman, Sue Weatherley, Greg Dyer, Think Planners, M. Dibben, Department of Environment and Planning, Debbie Killian, Neville Davis and Parramatta City Council personally responsible for Fraud and Deceit under the Maxims of Law;
    1. It is safer to be deceived than to deceive.
    2. A deceiver deals in generals.
    3. Fraud lies hid in general expressions.
    4. He who receives a benefit from a wrong, should also bear the disadvantage
    5. He who derives a benefit from a ‘thing’, ought to feel the disadvantage attending it.
    6. A concealed fault is equal to a deceit.
    7. Out of fraud no action arises.
    8. A forestaller is an oppressor of the poor, and a public enemy to the whole community and the country.
    9. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud.
    10. Gross negligence is equivalent to fraud.
    11. Once a fraud, always a fraud.
    12. What otherwise is good and just, if it be sought by force and fraud, becomes bad and unjust.
    13. He is not deceived who knows himself to be deceived.
    14. Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived.
    15. He who does not prevent what he can, seems to commit the thing.
    16. He who does not prevent what he can prevent, is viewed as assenting.
    17. He who does not forbid what he can forbid, seems to assent.
    18. He who does not forbid, when he might forbid, commands.
    19. He who does not repel a wrong when he can, induces it.
    20. Often it is the new road, not the old one, which deceives the traveler.
    21. Deceit is an artifice, since it pretends one thing and does another.
    22. A right cannot arise from a wrong.
    23. It is better to suffer every wrong or ill, than to consent to it.
    24. It is better to recede than to proceed wrongly.
    25. To lie is to go against the mind.
    26. The multitude of those who err is no excuse for error. [Exodus 23:2]
    27. No one is considered as committing damages, unless he is doing what he has no right to do.
    28. No one shall take advantage of his own wrong.
    29. No man ought to derive any benefit of his own wrong.
    30. No one ought to gain by another’s loss.
    31. No one ought to enrich himself at the expense of others.
    32. He who uses his lawful rights, harms no one.
    33. The truth that is not sufficiently defended is frequently overpowered; and he who does not disapprove, approves.
    34. Suppression of the truth is equivalent to the expression of what is false.
    35. An error not resisted is approved.
    36. He who is silent appears to consent.
    37. Things silent are sometimes considered as expressed.
    38. To conceal is one thing, to be silent another.
    39. Concealment of the truth is (equivalent to) a statement of what is false.
    40. Suppression of fact, which should be disclosed, is the same in effect as willful misrepresentation.
    41. He who is before in time, is preferred in right.
    42. The Law of God and the law of the land are all one and both favor and preserve the common good of the land.
    43. Deliberate falsehood in one matter will be imputed to related matters
    44. It is better to recede than to proceed wrongly.
  • Take note that “we the proponents” are making Robert Lang, John Chedid, Sue Coleman, Sue Weatherley, Greg Dyer, Think Planners, M. Dibben, Department of Environment and Planning, Debbie Killian, Neville Davis and Parramatta City Council personally responsible as law is not to be violated by those in government.
  • Take note the Act for the Prevention and Punishment of criminal outrages upon natives of the Islands in the Pacific Ocean (Aboriginal, Originee’s, Maori) – 1872 & 1875 – Pacific Islanders Protection Act.
    1. Section 6 of the Pacific Islander Protection Act 1872-75 clearly limits the purported jurisdiction of the UK Parliament and its’ monarch to British Subjects ONLY.
    2. Section 7 of the Pacific Islander Protection Act 1872-75 states:
      Nothing herein or in any such Order in Council shall extend or be construed to extend to invest Her Majesty with any claim or title whatsoever to dominion or sovereignty over any such islands (i.e.: the Pacific Islands) or places as aforesaid (i.e.: the Australasian Colonies including Australia and NZ), or to derogate from the rights of the tribes or people inhabiting such islands or places, or of the Chiefs or rulers thereof, to such sovereignty or dominion……….” Clearly excluding the extension of the purported sovereignty of the parliament of the United Kingdom into the Australasian “Colonies” and Pacific Islands.
  • Take note that “we the proponents” are making Robert Lang, John Chedid, Sue Coleman, Sue Weatherley, Greg Dyer, Think Planners, M. Dibben, Department of Environment and Planning, Debbie Killian, Neville Davis and Parramatta City Council personally responsible for not dealing with all sovereign originals/orignees lands under the principles of sincerity and good faith in transaction with the recognition of Her Majesty’s Sovereignty in the Islands. This is in direct violation of 1839 Instructions from Lord Normanby, Standing Orders in Council states.
  •  Take note that “we the proponents” are making Robert Lang, John Chedid, Sue Coleman, Sue Weatherley, Greg Dyer, Think Planners, M. Dibben, Department of Environment and Planning, Debbie Killian, Neville Davis and Parramatta City Council personally responsible for not endeavoring by every possible means to open an intercourse with the sovereign tribal natives/originals/orginees,  ©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™, Sovereign Darug Tribes/Clans, Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwana Land, and Sovereign Nga Puhi Tribal Leader  to conciliate our affections, enjoining all subjects to live in amity and kindness. Instead respondents have set out to wantonly destroy sovereign tribal natives/originals/orginees and lands and give us unnecessary interruption in the exercise of our occupations. This is in direct violation of the orders to Governors Cook and Banks, two Proclamations (1835 and 1837) and the 1836 Vagrancy Act referring to all Aborigines.
  • Under the orders to Governors Cook and Banks, two Proclamations (1835 and 1837) and the 1836 Vagrancy Act referring to all Aborigines, it is stated:
  • “it is our will and pleasure that you do cause such offenders to be brought to punishment according to the degrees of the offence.”
  • Furthermore Greg Dyer personally stated in a letter dated 5th March 2014 [Attachment 10] “As Council does not believe you have any legal claim to respect of the land, it sees no value in meeting to discuss the proposed transition process”, Because You ‘Greg Dyer’ have NOT endeavored to make every possible means to open an intercourse with us to conciliate our affections to live in amity and kindness under the orders of Governors Cook and Banks, this is a direct violation.
  • Take note that Pursuant to the facts established before and by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the 22nd July, 2010 in the matter of the SKWXWU7-mesh-Squamish Government (SSG), that notice properly proposed and duly served on the crown, stands at law if not rebutted.
  • Take note that we “the Proponents” DO NOT CONSENT to any unlawful and illegal devaluing, diminishing, abrogating, subjugating, subordinating, usurping, invading, violating or theft of the “Sovereign” duly secured Beings, any and all creations there from, and property thereof. Any and all attempts by any ‘person’; ’agent’; ‘officer’; ‘citizen’; ‘servant’; ‘justice of the peace’; ‘police’ and (de facto) ‘actors’ of the illegal purported Parramatta City Council, any government corporation, body corporate, local government, CEO’s, Ministers, developers, contractors, staff, alleged owners of land to do so, they will be placed under citizen’s arrest, police notified and charges laid under the illegal judicial court system for Treachery, Human rights crimes against humanity, economic deprivation, operating a slavery system, trespass, illegally and unlawfully seizing property, selling property, forcible possession, theft, debt bondage, blackmail, extortion, political persecution, interference of tribal sacred lands, unlawful rates and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under Gods Lore/Law, Common and International Law, Aboriginal, Originee and Maori (Kawa, Tikanga, Customary) Lore/Law charged under the Treason Act 1571 and Crimes Act 1961. 
  • Take note that any and all ‘person’; ’agent’; ‘officer’; ‘citizen’; ‘servant’; ‘justice of the peace’; ‘police’ and (de facto) ‘actors’ of the Parramatta City Council is cautioned that the Common Law Court of Australia, Paremata of Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation and the Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwana Land is authorized to notify Her Majesty’s Royal Defence Force, immediately….“to arrest and take into custody any and all certain states of body, their agents, officers, and other actors, regardless of domicile by choice, owning, operating, aiding, abetting and operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS against any and all “Sovereign”.
  • Take note that If any Subjects of the Crown should impinge or usurp any and all “Sovereign”, it will be seen as an act of treason under the Treason Act 1571 and Crimes Act 1961; and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under Gods Lore/Law, Common and International Law, Aboriginal, Originee and Maori (Kawa, Tikanga, Customary) Lore/Law.
  • Take note that all attempts to resolve this matter through remedy have been IGNORED.
  • Have taken advantage of a privilege, as if it were, a private law applicable to you alone. However let it be known that one who avails himself to the benefits conferred by private law and/or statute cannot deny its validity.
  • Be advised that if DA/522/2014 does not cease immediately, you and your company will be added to the Commercial Lien Claim UCC1 – 2014-069-8362-5 and 2014-069-8361-8. Think Planners have ten (10) consecutive calendar days from receipt of the service guaranteed Australia Registered Post to identify, restore, and correct any and all errors, injuries, wrongs and damages of this International Jurisdiction within the time applied.
  • Be advised that if DA/319/2012/A does not cease immediately, M Dibben and company will be added to the Commercial Lien Claim UCC1 – 2014-069-8362-5 and 2014-069-8361-8. M Dibben and company have ten (10) consecutive calendar days from receipt of the service guaranteed Australia Registered Post to identify, restore, and correct any and all errors, injuries, wrongs and damages of this International Jurisdiction within the time applied.

 

This International Jurisdiction shall be made final, adopted and accepted by the Doctrines of Estoppel by acquiescence Law of the Record Apostille Common Law Notary Public confirmation and moral obligation.

 

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION AND OCCUPATION

Occupation by Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation and the Assembled Owners will commence as soon as immediately and the Flag of  Sovereign Queen Jingki of Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwana Land and United Tribes of New Zealand Flag 1835 (1834) will be erected.

 

  • Private owners will cease to own land and thereafter be named as residents on the land
  • Houses will be the ownership of the private owners
  • No one will lose access to navigable waterways
  • All purported land in the claim area will return to sovereign status
  • Rangihou Lands, Reserve, Rangihou Sacred Burial Site, 1A Morton St, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands will be protected by and used by the Assembled Owners
  • Rangihou Lands, Reserve, Rangihou Sacred Burial Site, 1A Morton St, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands will not be subject to municipal jurisdiction
  • Assembled Ownerswill harvest the land for food
  • Assembled Owners will occupy the land
  • No lands will be transferred from Rangihou Lands, Reserve, Rangihou Sacred Burial Site, 1A Morton St, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands

 

INTERNATIONAL CITIZENS ARREST WARRANT


It is at this time that I announce and declare, any and all ‘persons’; ’agents’; ‘officers’; ‘citizens’; ‘servants’; ‘justice of the peace’; ‘police’, ‘actors’ of the illegal purported Parramatta City Council, any government corporation, body corporate, local government, NSW Police, Federal Police, CEO’s, Ministers, developers, contractors, staff, Lien Debtors, alleged owners of land, have now been WARNED as per this Notice of International Jurisdiction – NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL, NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT!

Under the Common Law Court of Australia, International Law and with the assistance of Australian Police powers, YOU are now WARNED that we will seek you out and put you under CITIZEN’S ARREST if you ignore this notice, continue to operate a slavery system and/or trespass on the Rangihou Lands, Rangihou Sacred Burial Site, 1A Morton Street, 2 Morton Street and Baludarri Wetlands, as per this Notice of International Jurisdiction – NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL, NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT.

Under the Common Law Court of Australia, International Law and with the assistance of Australian Police, YOU are, or have committed an offence, act of treason and have knowing and willingly committed an offence against humanity and the human rights of all sovereigns of Gondwana Land and Aotearoa and can now be put under CITIZEN’S ARREST  and charged under the Treason Act 1571 and Crimes Act 1961; for Treachery and Human rights crimes against humanity and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under Gods Lore/Law, Common and International Law, Aboriginal, Originee and Maori (Kawa, Tikanga, Customary) Lore/Law.  Let it be known that human rights abuses are more serious than war crimes and placed ‘economic deprivation’ at the upper end of the penalty scale. Any person directly involved in an illegal act of economic deprivation (for which the United Nation’s penalty scale is from five (5) to twenty-five (25) years).

Our Peace Officers have been given your names and valid arrest warrants. They will seek you and your staff out, simply place their hand on your shoulder and say, “You are under arrest. I charge you with Treachery, Human rights crimes against humanity, economic deprivation, operating a slavery system, trespass, illegally and unlawfully seizing property, selling property, forcible possession, theft, debt bondage, blackmail, extortion, political persecution, interference of tribal sacred lands, unlawful rates and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under Gods Lore/Law, Common and International Law, Aboriginal, Originee and Maori (Kawa, Tikanga, Customary) Lore/Law.   You must accompany me to the police station so the charges can be lodged to have you brought before the courts to determine your guilt or innocence.” There the complaint will be recorded and passed on for due process under your illegal United Kingdom Judicial system.

“Now how is that for Justice, being locked up in a jail under your invalid illegal judicial system?”

“Watch your back because we are coming for you………This is not a threat, this is an act.”

You should now take the time to consider your position, as you have been WARNED and as an individual with access to the Internet, telephone and postal service if you continue to act in any manner against a sovereign, you will be denied any defence as to your lack of knowledge of the facts outlined herein.

In order to enforce this Order and henceforth the responsibility, Hoori Harihona Paerata, Tribal Leader Patu Koraha Tribal Nation of Tribal Sovereign Nations of the Earth and Justice of the Peace, will publicly deputize any and all members of the NSW Police Department to enforce this legal order for citizens arrest, as is their duty and obligation under common law, and that any refusal by them to do so, or any attempt by them to prevent me or our sovereign capacity from enforcing this Order, will be considered an act of hostile intent and criminality by them, and a violation of their oath of office. In the event of such a dereliction of duty on the part of these police officers, we reserve our right under common law to appoint Public Peace Officers to maintain the peace and enforce this lawful Order according to the principle Actus legis nemini facit injuriam, ‘The act of the law does no one an injury.’

Be advised that common law peace officers authorized to enforce the International Citizen’s Arrest Warrants have been issued and attached for distribution. [Attachment 13]

 

The International Citizen’s Arrest Warrant has been lodged and were served on the 10th September 2014

 

EVICTION NOTICE

Be advised that the Public Notice of Eviction Order and Right of Entry Order was served 8th September 2014

 

PRESS RELEASE

Be advised that a Press Release was released  8th September 2014

 

RESIDENTS, CHURCHES, SCHOOLS AND BUSINESS OWNERS

Be advised that home owners, businesses, companies, churches in the International Jurisdiction Zone will be notified in due course of this Notice of International Jurisdiction and discussion will take place in private.

 

REMEDY

As a peaceful gesture,  ©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™ sovereign administrators are prepared to meet with the Named Respondents in order prove that we are alive, well and sovereign and settle this matter under International Jurisdiction.

If no means is taken to initiate communication and settle this matter by the respondents, Parramatta City Council, Department of Environment and Planning, Think Planners and M Dibben further action will be taken. ICAC Commissioner shall be informed immediately of this International Jurisdiction along with Parramatta Sheriff, NSW Police, International Law Sheriff, Commissioner of Police, The International Common Law Court of Justice, The International Court and the Media.

Respondents and Parramatta City have 10 consecutive days from receipt of accepting this notice via Australia Post to make contact with ©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™ sovereign administrators to discuss remedy.

 

FINAL PROVISION

 

ICAC Commissioner shall be informed of the development with intentions to look further into the matter of how a Major Development could be approved between two rare sites of State and National site significance. You are again remaindered ““No one in this executive arm of government…is above the reach of this commission: ICAC Megan Latham warns” (The Daily Telegraph 28th August 2014) and ICAC exposed the NSW Legislature as the most corrupt parliament in Australian history (The Daily Telegraph 29th August 2014).

 

ITCCS.org (Kevin Arnett) International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State shall be informed of the Treachery, Human rights crimes against humanity, economic deprivation, operating a slavery system, trespass, illegally and unlawfully seizing property, selling property, forcible possession, theft, debt bondage, blackmail, extortion, political persecution, interference of tribal sacred lands, unlawful rates and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under Gods Lore/Law, Common and International Law, Aboriginal, Originee and Maori (Kawa, Tikanga, Customary) Lore/Law, genocide of children at the Maori Seminary  with intentions to look further into the matter of how a Major Development could be approved between two rare sites of State, National Historical Site Significance  sacred burial site and the genocide and crimes against humanity.

©Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation™ reminds the respondents that its members are not interested in war but operate with a Divine guidance to serve the mandate for Universal Peace with the laws of karma and our Earth Mother. If you have any questions or require more evidence, kindly email us at pbr@nmncorp.com.au and write to Christian 699/70NZ, PO Box 9144 Harris Park NSW 2150.

 

Together we seal this lawful instrument and International Jurisdiction with due diligence as evidenced by our representatives which is hereby acknowledged and accepted, to exercise our right to live without malice aforethought, ill will, vexation or frivolity, without corporate dictate.

 

Affirmed and respectfully sent by registered post and email to the respondents and Parramatta City Council, Think Planners, M. Dibben, Department of Environment and Planning, The Hon Tony Abbott, The Governor General, ICAC Commissioner, Commissioner of Police, Parramatta Sheriff, NSW Premier, Attorney General, United Nation President, United Nations Information Centre, Kevin Arnett ITCCS.org, Lee Nangala Lacey, Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwana Land, Tribal Sovereign Nations of the Earth  on this 8th day of September, 2014AD. As witnessed, signed, sealed and delivered,

 

In Gondwana Land appeared the proponent personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the sovereign who has appeared within this instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed it.

 

Witness by my hand and official seal on behalf of the Paremata O Baludarri Rangihou Sovereign Nation & Embassy Assembled Owners

HONGI TURI TOGETHER

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s